SCHEDULE II. THE SECOND SCHEDULE. 1. INFORMATION. A. B., of In the Supreme Court of the Colony of Lagos. an officer of Customs under the direction of informs the Court the Collector of Customs at COUNT 1. On Sec. 149. On Sec. 149. On Sec. 149. On Sec. 149. On Sec. 151. That C. D. did make and subscribe a false declaration or document purporting to be (state the nature of the document generally), the same being false and untrue, contrary to Section 149 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 2. That C. D. did untruly answer a certain question put to him. by , an officer of Customs, contrary to Section 149 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 3. That C. D. did counterfeit or falsify (or wilfully use when counterfeited or falsified, as the case may be) a certain document purporting to be (state the nature of the document generally) contrary to Section 149 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 4. That C. D. did fraudulently alter (or counterfeit, as the case may be) the seal, signature, initials or mark of or used by an officer of Customs contrary to Section 149 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 5. whereof C. D. That a certain ship or boat called the was owner (or master, as the case may be), was unlawfully used in importing, exporting, landing, removing, or carrying of certain uncustomed or prohibited goods to wit (here mention generally the goods), contrary to Section 151 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ which the Collector of Customs has directed to be sued for in this case. COUNT 6. SCHEDULE II. That C. D. obstructed a person duly employed for the prevention On Sec. 170. of smuggling, contrary to Section 170 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 7. That C. D. denied the possession of certain foreign goods, to wit On Sec. 170. (mention generally the goods) which were afterwards found to be (or to have been) in his possession, contrary to Section 170 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ , being treble the value of the said goods. COUNT 8. That C. D., an officer of did without reasonable ground On Sec. 172. require a certain person, to wit one E. F., to be searched contrary to Section 172 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of ten pounds. COUNT 9. That C. D. was concerned in importing certain prohibited or On Sec. 173. restricted goods to wit (here mention generally the goods), contrary to Section 173 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ , being treble the value of the said goods (or the penalty of one hundred pounds, as the case may be), for which the Collector of Customs has elected to sue. COUNT 10. That C. D. was concerned in unshipping or otherwise dealing On Sec. 173. with prohibited, restricted, or uncustomed goods, to wit (here mention generally the goods) contrary to Section 173 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ , being treble the value of the said goods (or the penalty of one hundred pounds, as the case may be), for which the Collector of Customs has elected to sue. COUNT 11. That C. D. was concerned in the illegal removal of certain goods, On Sec. 173. to wit (here mention the goods generally) from a warehouse, or otherwise illegally dealing with the same after they had been so removed, contrary to Section 173 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ being treble the value of the said goods (or the penalty of one hundred pounds, as the case may be), for which the Collector of Customs has elected to sue. SCHEDULE II. On Sec. 173. On Sec. 174. On Sec. 175. On Sec. 179. On Sec. 180. On Sec. 180. COUNT 12. That C. D. was knowingly concerned in evading duties of Customs upon or in dealing with certain goods, to wit (here state the goods generally), with intent to defraud Her Majesty of the duties of Customs in respect thereof, contrary to Section 173 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ , being treble the value of the goods (or the penalty of one hundred pounds, as the case may be), for which the Collector of Customs has elected to sue. COUNT 13. That C. D. was concerned in the removal of certain goods, to wit (here mention generally the goods) or otherwise dealing with the same, contrary to Section 174 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ being treble the value of the said goods (or the penalty of one hundred pounds, as the case may be), for which the Collector of Customs has elected to sue. COUNT 14. That C. D. was found to have been on board a ship liable to forfeiture contrary to Section 175 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of one hundred pounds. COUNT 15. That C. D. offered certain goods for sale, to wit (mention generally the goods) contrary to Section 179 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has forfeited the sum of £ being treble the value of the said goods. COUNT 16. That C. D. was concerned in the assembling of persons contrary to Section 180 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has become liable to be imprisoned as is therein directed. COUNT 17. That C. D. obstructed persons employed for the prevention of smuggling, or was concerned in the rescue or attempt at rescue of seized goods, or in the destruction or attempt at destruction of seized goods, contrary to Section 180 of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said C. D. has become liable to be imprisoned as is therein directed. COUNT 18. That certain goods, to wit (here mention generally the goods) were seized on the day of for being dealt with contrary to Section (insert the section in figures) of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the said goods have become liable to forfeiture, and SCHEDULE II. that C. D. has claimed the same. An information having been exhibited by A. B., an officer of Customs, under the direction of the Collector of Customs, setting forth (copy the count or counts of the information). You the said C. D. are hereby commanded in Her Majesty's name to appear in person before this Court at on the day of to answer the said information and on every adjournment of the Court till the case is disposed of. Issued at 18 this day of 18 (Signature of Judge or Commissioner.) 3. SUMMONS ON INFORMATION FOR CONDEMNATION OF SEIZURES. To C. D., of An information having been exhibited by A. B., an officer of Customs, under the direction of the Collector of Customs, for the condemnation of (state the goods seized) seized on the of 18, for being dealt with contrary to Section of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, and claimed by you. on the day of day You are hereby commanded in Her Majesty's name to appear before this Court at 18 to show cause why the said goods should not be condemned as forfeited, and on every adjournment of the Court till the case is disposed of. (Signature of Judge or Commissioner.) 4. CONDEMNATION OF SEIZED GOODS. In the Supreme Court of the Colony of Lagos. An information having been exhibited before this Court at for the condemnation of (state the goods), for being dealt with contrary to Section of the Customs Ordinance, 1876, whereby the same became liable to forfeiture, and which said. goods having been claimed by C. D., who was summoned to show cause why the same should not be condemned, and the forfeiture thereof having been proved, the Court adjudges the same to be forfeited, and condemns the same accordingly. Dated at SCHEDULE II. 5. GENERAL WAREHOUSING BOND. Know all men by these presents, that we day 18 this Whereas which said premises have been approved by the Collector of Customs of the Colony of Lagos for the reception of such goods as may from time to time be permitted to be warehoused therein under the laws relating to the Customs. Now the condition of this obligation is such, that if the full duties and rates of Customs due and payable on all goods which have been warehoused in the said premises and not duly cleared therefrom, or which hereafter may from time to time be warehoused or re-warehoused in the said premises, shall immediately on the delivery or respective deliveries thereof or non-production on demand by the proper officer of Customs be paid to the Collector or other proper officer of the Customs at the port of and that the whole of the goods so warehoused or re-warehoused shall be duly cleared, exported, or re-warehoused within two years from the warehousing or re-warehousing thereof respectively, or within such further period as the said Collector of Customs shall direct, and that upon the exportation or upon each re-warehousing of any such goods, as the case may be, the full duties due upon any deficiency found therein on examination for such exportation or re-warehousing, shall thereupon be paid to the Collector or other proper officer of the Customs at the said port. 6. BOND FOR THE REMOVAL OF WAREHOUSED GOODS. Know all men by these presents, that we, this Whereas the following goods, that is to say— are now |