Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 200 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 29
... effect of a seal was changed by section 840 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the extent of making the seal presumptive evidence only of consideration in case of an executory agreement , the con- sideration for a release under seal ...
... effect of a seal was changed by section 840 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the extent of making the seal presumptive evidence only of consideration in case of an executory agreement , the con- sideration for a release under seal ...
Page 44
... effect of the provisions of defendant's franchise . APPEAL by the defendant , Public Service Corporation of Long Island , from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the App . Div . 44 ] Second Department , February 44 TOWN OF ...
... effect of the provisions of defendant's franchise . APPEAL by the defendant , Public Service Corporation of Long Island , from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the App . Div . 44 ] Second Department , February 44 TOWN OF ...
Page 46
... effect of the provisions of this franchise under consideration . Section 62 of the Transportation Corporations Law relates entirely to the obligation of a lighting corporation to furnish light to owners and occupants of buildings , and ...
... effect of the provisions of this franchise under consideration . Section 62 of the Transportation Corporations Law relates entirely to the obligation of a lighting corporation to furnish light to owners and occupants of buildings , and ...
Page 77
... effect , and , therefore , the jury might have so found . ( Chisholm v . State , 141 N. Y. 246 ; Hart v . Hudson River Bridge Co. , 80 id . 622 ; Miller v . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. , 134 App . Div . 212 ; Inglese v . N. Y. , N. H. ...
... effect , and , therefore , the jury might have so found . ( Chisholm v . State , 141 N. Y. 246 ; Hart v . Hudson River Bridge Co. , 80 id . 622 ; Miller v . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. , 134 App . Div . 212 ; Inglese v . N. Y. , N. H. ...
Page 80
... effect that at the conference the defendant merely claimed that it was not convenient for it to receive any more of the goods at that time , and at defendant's request he set apart and held for it at his place of business the remaining ...
... effect that at the conference the defendant merely claimed that it was not convenient for it to receive any more of the goods at that time , and at defendant's request he set apart and held for it at his place of business the remaining ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed agreement alleged amended amount Appellant April attorney bill bill of lading Blackmar Boland Company bond cause of action chap charge City Civil Procedure claim clerk Commission complaint concur contract corporation costs and disbursements counsel damages defendant defendant's delivered demurrer dismissed dollars costs Dowling employee entitled evidence ex rel executor fact granted GREENBAUM Impleaded Insurance Company issue January Jaycox Judgment and order jury justice Kelly Laughlin lease March Matter ment Merrell mortgage North Penn Bank opinion Order affirmed paid parties payment person plaintiff premises proceeding purchase question real property received recover reference refused Respondent restrictive covenant Second Department statute Statute of Frauds subd Supreme Court Surrogate's Court ten dollars costs tenant testator testified testimony thereafter thereof Third Department trial verdict witnesses York county York National
Popular passages
Page 103 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.
Page 158 - To receive the rents and profits of real property, and apply them to the use Of any person, during the life of that person, or for any shorter term, subject to the provisions of law relating thereto; 4.
Page 723 - ... an issue of fact must be tried by a jury, unless a jury trial is waived, or a reference is ordered, as provided in this code.
Page 103 - The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress, or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
Page 121 - Where the seller delivers to the buyer the goods he contracted to sell mixed with goods of a different description not included in the contract, the buyer may accept the goods which are in accordance with the contract and reject the rest, or he may reject the whole.
Page 682 - The drawer by drawing the instrument admits the existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse ; and engages that on due presentment the instrument will be accepted or paid, or both, according to its tenor, and that if it be dishonored, and the necessary proceedings...
Page 388 - ... property; also from interest, rent, dividends, securities, or the transaction of any business carried on for gain or profit, or gains or profits and Income derived from any source whatever.
Page 260 - A tax shall be and is hereby imposed upon the transfer of any property, real or personal, of the value of $500 or over, or of any interest therein or income therefrom, in trust or otherwise, to persons or corporations not exempt by law from taxation on real or personal property in the following cases : "1.
Page 656 - Where, under a contract to sell or a sale, the price is payable on a day certain, irrespective of delivery or of transfer of title, and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay such price, the seller may maintain an action for the price, although the property in the goods has not passed, and the goods have not been appropriated to the contract.
Page 103 - A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties, and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon.