Brought Forward..........
$5,000 New York Central & Hudson River R. R. (Deb. 4's-1934).
5,000 Baldwin Locomotive Co. (Sinking Fund 5's-1934).. 5,000 Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. (Collateral Trust 4's-1930). 5,000 New York and Erie Railway (2d Mtg. 5's-1919).
5,000 City of Macon, Ga. (4}'s—1932)..
5,000 Lehigh Valley Transit Co. (1st Mtg. 4's-1935). 4,000 New York and Erie Railway (3d Mtg. 44's-1923). Cash in Bank..
Accused: Compulsory examination of, 128, 130, 131; compulsory testimony of, 126; Jeremy Bentham on testi- mony of, 126, 127; presumed inno- cence of, 95.
ACCUSED, THE PRIVILEGE OF THE, TO REFUSE TO TESTIFY. Herbert R. Limburg, 124-131. ALIEN, IN RELATION TO Our Laws, THE. Gino C. Speranza, 169–176. America, judges needed in legal pro- cedure in, 206.
AMERICAN AND CANADIAN COURTS, A COMPARISON OF SOME OF THE PRIN- CIPLES AND RULES OF PRACTICE OF THE. David W. Amram, 191-199. American Bar Association: Composi- tion of, 80; statute advanced by, regarding reversed judgments, 100. American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, work of, for re- form in criminal code, 107. AMERICAN JUDICATURE SOCIETY. Causes for Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice in Metro- politan Districts, 208-221. American Judicature Society, the, 81, 82.
AMRAM, DAVID W. A Comparison of Some of the Principles and Rules of Practice of the American and Can- adian Courts, 191–199.
Bar: Methods of selecting, retiring and disciplining members of the, 217-223; need for solidarity and self-government in, 81.
BAR, ORGANIZATION OF THE. Her- bert Harley, 77-82. BARTELME, MARY M. The Oppor- tunity for Women in Court Admin- istration, 188-190.
Bentham, Jeremy, on testimony of accused, 126, 127.
BOLSTER, WILFRED. Adult Proba- tion, 132-139.
BORCHARD, EDWIN M.
State Indem- nity for Errors of Criminal Justice, 108-114.
Boston, municipal court in, 135. Buffalo, municipal court in, 100.
California: Commission on immigra-
tion and housing in, 168; indemnity for error in criminal justice in, 114. Canada: Criminal code in, 107; flex- ibility of legislative procedure in, 191.
Chicago, municipal court in, 100. CHICAGO COURT OF DOMESTIC RELA- TIONS. William N. Gemmill, 115- 123.
Chief justice: Appointment of judges by, 12; filling of vacancies by, 7, 8; impeachment of, 9; power of, 9; recall of, 9; retirement of, 9; to re- main judges on retirement, 9. Cleveland, city immigration bureau in, 168.
Constitution: Amendment of, 26; purpose of, 14.
Constitutional amendment: A cum- bersome process, 30; adoption of, 18; advantages of recall of decisions over, 33; an illogical means in police power cases, 32; an inappropriate process, 31; arguments for, 18, 21; Bryce on, 34, 35; in case of dissatis- faction with judicial decisions, 16, 17; in Massachusetts, 23; inade- quacy of, in dealing with police power cases, 30.
Court of claims, 109, 112.
in, 115, 119, 120; effect of, 121; func- tion of, 116.
COURT OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS, CHI- CAGO. William N. Gemmill, 115- 123.
Courts: As representative of the people, 16; division of, for handling classes of litigation, 11; enlarge- ment of power of American, 192; multiplicity of, 194; opinion of, in determining constitutionality of laws, 29.
Crime: Absence of statistics on, 85; new theory as to responsibility for, 64; purpose of statistics of, 83; responsibility of federal govern- ment for statistics on, 86; statistics of, 83, 84.
CRIME FROM A STATISTICAL VIEW-
POINT. John Koren, 83-88. Criminal cases: Criticisms against, 125; reversion of, on account of technical errors, 100.
Criminal code, in Canada and New Zealand, 107. Criminal courts:
Conducted under outworn technicalities, 96, 97; crime situation and the, 84; records of, as source of criminal information, 87. CRIMINAL JUSTICE, STATE INDEMNITY FOR ERRORS OF. Edwin M. Bor- chard, 108-114.
Criminal law: Lack of uniformity in administration of, 103; mistakes in administration of, 108; modifica- tion of, 89.
Criminal procedure: Changes in, 102, 103; code of, 102, 104; definition of, 102. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, REFORM IN. William E. Mikell, 102-107. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE EVOLU- TION OF OUR. Samuel Scoville, Jr., 93–101.
Criminalism: Business-like treatment of, 90, 91; causes of, 91; central government and, 92. Criminals: Absence of data concern- ing, 89; studies concerning, 92. CRIMINALS, CRITIQUE ON RECORDING DATA CONCERNING. William Healy, 89-92.
District attorney: Duties of, 39, 41, 46; office of, 44, 45, 53. Divorce court, object of, 116
ELIOT, THOMAS D. The Trend of the Juvenile Court, 149-158. Elmira Reformatory, the, 90. England: Appointment of judges in, 200; court of criminal appeal in, 203; disregard of technicalities in trial of cases in, 201; early criminal procedure in, 93; public opinion and judges in, 201; public prosecutor in, 205; rapidity with which cases are tried in, 205; small number of courts in, 200.
Europe: Indemnity for mistakes in criminal jurisdiction in, 110; police in, 60; presumption regarding ac- cused in, 95.
Governor, appointment of judges by, 6.
Grand jury: A valuable institution,
54; absence of members of, 39; busi- ness of, 41; difference between, and petty jury, 37; historic origin of, 37; how constituted, 37; interpre- ters connected with, 40; number of names on list of, 38; recommenda- tions in regard to work of, 53; rela- tive authority of, and district at- torney, 46, 47.
GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, THE. George Haven Put- nam, 37–55.
GRAY, R. S. The Advisability of a Public Defender, 177-180. GRIFFITHS, JOHN L.
Identification, necessity of recording data for, 92.
Illinois: Bureau of criminal statis- tics in, 84; juvenile court act in, 144; juvenile offenders in, 142; prison- ers' earnings in, 118; wife-abandon- ment statute in, 119. IMMIGRANT, JUSTICE FOR THE. Fran- ces A. Kellor, 159-168.
Immigrants' court, in New York, 168.
Immigration laws, enactment of, 173. Indiana, bureau of statistics in, 84. Indictment: Laws governing, 104; needless technicalities in, 104, 105; provisions necessary for validity of, 105; purpose of, 106.
Judges: Appointment of, 3, 194, 200; appointment of: by chief justice, 12; by extra legal government, 5; by governor, 6; by highest appellate tribunal of state, 7; in metropolitan district, 1, 2; through primaries, 5. Choice of, by electorate, 4; com- plaints against, 11; confusion of recall of, with recall of decisions, 25; effect of service to organiza- tion in choice of, 5; election of, at special elections, 3, 6; election of, by people, 1; limited tenure of ap- pointed, 10; method of selecting, 1; necessity for appointment of, in metropolitan district, 6, 12; objec- tions to appointment of, 10; organ- ization of, after election, 214, 215; popular dissatisfaction with, 2; power of politocrats over, 2; pub- lic opinion and English, 201; recall of, 2, 3, 10, 11, 77; salary of English, 200; selection, retirement and dis- ciplining of, 209-213.
JUDGES, METHOD OF SELECTING AND RETIRING, IN A METROPOLITAN DIS- TRICT. Albert M. Kales, 1-12. Judicial ballot, and rotation of can- didates, 3, 4.
council: Appointment of mem- bers of bar by, 12; effect of existence of, 12;
election, special, 1.
recall, attitude of lawyers to- ward, 77.
system, inadequacy of, to meet demands of justice, 177. Judiciary, vacancies in, 7, 8. Jurors, votes necessary for quorum, 37, 38.
Jury: In Ontario, 197; selection of, as judge of facts, 215, 216. Justice: Administration of, by pri- vate detectives, 177; efficiency in administration of, 78; responsibil- ity of government for error in ad- ministration of, 6.
« PreviousContinue » |