## Linear Operators: Spectral theory |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 86

Page 1019

The

The

**inequality**is obvious for n = 1 and may be easily checked for n = 2. We shall suppose the**inequality**to be known for n - 1 , and proceed by induction . If ( a ) is an nxn matrix , let Ug = ( azj , Agj , ... , ans ] , i 1 1 , ...Page 1094

Then by Minkowski's

Then by Minkowski's

**inequality**, 11 ( 3 len ( 7 ) ) " > { , } " + { ] k ( 7 , " * 5 Tiln + Telp . In the same way ŠT } " ' s Talo + 1Tube Thus the first assertion of ( b ) follows on addition . The assertion of ( b ) , for the range 0 ...Page 1105

We now pause to sharpen another of the

We now pause to sharpen another of the

**inequalities**of Lemma 9 . ... the continuity of the norm function which follows from the triangle**inequality**of Lemma 14 ( d ) , and by Lemma 11 , it follows that we may without loss of generality ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

BAlgebras | 859 |

Miscellaneous Applications | 937 |

Compact Groups | 945 |

Copyright | |

44 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

additive adjoint operator algebra Amer analytic assume Banach spaces basis belongs Borel boundary conditions boundary values bounded called clear closed closure coefficients compact complex Consequently constant contains continuous converges Corollary corresponding defined Definition denote dense determined domain eigenvalues element equal equation essential spectrum evident Exercise exists extension finite follows formal differential operator formula function function f given Hence Hilbert space identity independent indices inequality integral interval Lemma limit linear mapping Math matrix measure multiplicity neighborhood norm obtained partial positive preceding present problem projection proof properties prove range regular remark representation respectively restriction result satisfies seen sequence singular solution spectral square-integrable statement subset subspace sufficiently Suppose symmetric Theorem theory topology transform unique vanishes vector zero