Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 35 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... reason that they were more suitable for other purposes , and were held for sale by appellant , and were finally sold by it , as will more fully appear hereafter . The additional facts necessary to a full understanding of the points ...
... reason that they were more suitable for other purposes , and were held for sale by appellant , and were finally sold by it , as will more fully appear hereafter . The additional facts necessary to a full understanding of the points ...
Page 18
... reason for holding that a respondent is deprived of a hear- ing upon his assignment of cross - errors simply because ... reasons that seem to us , not only convincing , but unanswerable . He there lays down the rule that an assignment of ...
... reason for holding that a respondent is deprived of a hear- ing upon his assignment of cross - errors simply because ... reasons that seem to us , not only convincing , but unanswerable . He there lays down the rule that an assignment of ...
Page 20
... reason why they should not present their matters on a cross - appeal , and not confuse the appeal which relates only to the parties in their capacity as appellants or appellees . The right to assign and to be heard on cross- errors is ...
... reason why they should not present their matters on a cross - appeal , and not confuse the appeal which relates only to the parties in their capacity as appellants or appellees . The right to assign and to be heard on cross- errors is ...
Page 21
... purposes . The court submitted the question of damages to the jury , and left it to them to determine how much the value of the prop- erty not taken was depreciated by reason of the construction RAILROAD V. BOARD OF EDUCATION . 21.
... purposes . The court submitted the question of damages to the jury , and left it to them to determine how much the value of the prop- erty not taken was depreciated by reason of the construction RAILROAD V. BOARD OF EDUCATION . 21.
Page 22
... reason of the construction and operation of the railroad . As a guide to the jury the court , in effect , told them that if they found that the location and operation of the railroad affected the property so that it could no longer be ...
... reason of the construction and operation of the railroad . As a guide to the jury the court , in effect , told them that if they found that the location and operation of the railroad affected the property so that it could no longer be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
33 Utah action adverse possession agent agreement alleged appellant appellant's assignment attorney authority bill of exceptions bonds Box Elder county Brigham City Budge cause circumstances claim Comp complaint Constitution contract contributory negligence Conway corporation counsel damages deceased deed default defect defendant defendant's dence district court duty election engine error evidence executed facts franchise FRICK garnishment proceedings Granger ground held injury issue J. Y. Rich judgment judgment debtor jurisdiction jury justice land liability Logan City matter ment motion negligence notice operation ordinary Oregon Short Line owner paid parties payment perjury person Peterson plaintiff possession purchase purpose question quiet title railroad company reason record recover refused respondent respondent's rule Salt Lake City Salt Lake county statute STRAUP street sufficient testified thereof tion track train orders trial court Utah Light verdict Wilson witness writ
Popular passages
Page 269 - We may lay it down as a broad general principle, that, wherever one of two innocent persons must suffer by the acts of a third, he who has enabled such third person to occasion the loss must sustain it.
Page 460 - Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.
Page 495 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party, and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 279 - Ostensible authority is such as a principal, intentionally or by want of ordinary care, causes or allows a third person to believe the agent to possess.
Page 217 - ... any demand which may be established against the defendant by the final judgment of the court. But if there is no appearance of the defendant, and no service of process on him, the case becomes in its essential nature a proceeding in rem, the only effect of which is to subject the property attached to the payment of the demand which the court may find to be due to the plaintiff.
Page 589 - The Legislature shall not pass any laws permitting the leasing or alienation of any franchise, so as to relieve the franchise or property held thereunder from the liabilities of the lessor or grantor, lessee or grantee, contracted or incurred in the operation, use, or enjoyment of such franchise, or any of its privileges.
Page 311 - Franklin circuit court, for $20,000.00 damages for the death of his intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of...
Page 283 - But it is urged that this case falls within the general principle which has become a maxim of law, that when one of two innocent persons must suffer by the acts of a third, he who has enabled such third person to occasion the loss, must sustain it.
Page 43 - There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law; it would be contrary to common sense and reason, if it were so.
Page 455 - Where a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and no right to retain the instrument, or to give a discharge therefor, or to enforce payment thereof against any party thereto, can be acquired through or under such signature, unless the party against whom it is sought to enforce such right is precluded from setting up the forgery or want of authority.