 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1891 - 782 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...If that exists, the right to establish the maximum of charge as one of the means of regulation is implied. In fact, the common-law rule, which requires... | |
 | Law - 1887 - 542 pages
...262. As their business is " affected with a public interest," it is subject to legislative regulation. "In matters which do affect the public Interest, and...subject, the courts must determine what is reasonable." Waite, CJ, in Afunn v. Illinois, 94 US 113, 134. It ia upon this foundation, and not alone because... | |
 | Law - 1877 - 558 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what Is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...If that exists, the right to establish the maximum of charge, as one of the means of regulation, is implied. In fact, the common-law rule, which requires... | |
 | Illinois - 1877 - 182 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...If that exists; the right to establish the maximum of charge, as one of the means of regulation, is implied. In fact, the common law rule, which requires... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - United States - 1877 - 526 pages
...because the legislature b:is DO control over such a contract. So, too, in matters which do aft'ect the public interest, and as to which legislative control...the courts must determine what is reasonable. The continuing act is the power to regulate at all. If that exists, the right to establish the maximum... | |
 | Georgia Public Service Commission - Railroads - 1880 - 652 pages
...by adequate penalties." In Munn's case, 94 U. 8. R., at page 134, the court uses this language : " The controlling fact is, the power to regulate at...If that exists, the right to establish the maximum of cliarge as one of the means of regulation is implied." X» comment is necessary upon this charter,... | |
 | Edward Lillie Pierce - Railroad law - 1881 - 684 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...in matters which do affect the public interest, and аз to which legislative control ma}' be exercised, if there are no statutory regulations upon the... | |
 | David Rorer - Railroad law - 1884 - 996 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...statutory regulations upon the subject, the courts must de termine what is reasonable. The controlling fact is the power to regulate at all. If that.exists,... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1885 - 760 pages
...public has no interest, what State v. RVRR Co. is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...If that exists, the right to establish the maximum of charge as one of the means of regulation is implied. In fact, the common law rule, which requires... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1886 - 926 pages
...matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such...If that exists, the right to establish the maximum of charge as onr ot the means of regulation is implied. In fact, the common-lav rule, which requires... | |
| |
Undoubtedly in mere private contracts, relating to matters in which the public has no interest, what is reasonable must be ascertained judicially. But this is because the legislature has no control over such a contract. So, too, in matters which do affect... 
