Page images
PDF
EPUB

with their force, well armed; the magistrates were early at their posts; the park-gates were closed, and the citizens took the hints of the newspapers to stay at home; aides-de-camp were in the streets, in plain clothes, to reconnoitre; and five thousand householders were quickly sworn in as special constables at Guildhall. As for Lord Melbourne, he was not visible. The under-secretary, Mr Phillips, received the deputation, and told them that a petition, however respectfully worded, could not be received by the minister when brought in such a manner, nor could Lord Melbourne grant an interview to a deputation so accompanied; that is, by a procession of 30,000 men. So the petition was placed on its cara car all blue and crimson-and carried away, to be presented again in a quiet and orderly manner, by a small deputation, five days afterwards. The whole procession repaired to Kennington Common, where Mr Phillips's reply was repeated on various parts of the ground. There was no attempt to measure their strength against the Duke of Wellington, with his troops and cannon-no attack upon the palace, the Bank, or the Tower. No soldiers were seen in the streets, and scarcely a policeman: when London was again asleep, the artillery and soldiery were conveyed away; and next day, the great city was as if nothing had happened. The end of the matter, as regarded the Dorsetshire labourers, was, that public opinion bore so strongly upon their case, that a free pardon was sent out to them, in Van Diemen's Land; and they returned in 1837, to be escorted through the streets of London, and past the government offices, by a procession of the trades as numerous as that which had petitioned in their favour in 1834.

On the retirement of Lords Grey and Althorp, the anxiety of the nation about who was to govern the country was less eager than might have been anticipated. The cause of the comparative indifference was, that a universal persuasion was abroad that any government that could be formed out of any party must be merely temporary. The feeling in favour of a liberal ministry was still too strong to permit any hope to the Conservatives; while the unpopularity of the Whigs, and the known apprehensions of the king about Church questions, rendered it improbable that such a cabinet as the last would keep any firm grasp of power.

It was immediately understood that the king's desire was for a coalition ministry. But this was clearly impracticable. The Commons would hear of no other leader on government questions than Lord Althorp; and they earnestly desired that he should be the head of the government. His station and character would have justified the appointment; and his unsurpassed popularity in parliament—a popularity which could not be fleeting, because it was grounded on fine qualities of mind and manners— would have been a strong point in favour of his administration. But he had not ability for such a position. He said so himself, and everybody knew it. His being premier was out of the question, but he was not to be parted with from office; and he gave up with a sigh the prospect of retirement to his country business and pleasures, received a pledge that the new Coercion Bill should be framed to

meet his views, and became again chancellor of the exchequer. It was Lord Melbourne, and no one else, with whom the king consulted upon the reconstruction of the cabinet. Lord Melbourne becoming premier, his place at the Home Office was taken by Lord Duncannon-made a peer; and Sir J. C. Hobhouse took the woods and forests, with a seat in the cabinet.

[ocr errors]

The first act of the reconstituted government was to carry a new Coercion Bill, in which the clauses prohibitory of political meetings were omitted. The subject of the late intrigues and follies, by which Lord Grey had been removed from office, was not allowed to drop. Repeated demands were made for the production of the lord-lieutenant's correspondence; and the son of Lord Grey pressed Mr Littleton with close questions as to who besides himself had been the correspondent of the lord-lieutenant. Mr Littleton had suffered too much to be indiscreet again he positively refused to answer; but it was not denied that there was another. In the Upper House the lord chancellor astonished his hearers by declaring his dissent from Lord Grey in regard to Mr Littleton's act of communicating with Mr O'Connell. He did not know how government could be carried on if certain leading men were to be considered as tabooed and interdicted from all communication with the government.' When, after making this declaration, he proceeded to avow that he had privately corresponded with the lord-lieutenant about the Coercion Bill, men felt that no answer was needed from Mr Littleton to Lord Howick's pressing questions. 'He was also'-after mentioning Mr Littleton's correspondence-'in the frequent habit of corresponding with the lord-lieutenant of Ireland. He had communicated with him on every subject interesting on this or the other side of the water.' The newspapers of the time pointed out the lord chancellor as the accomplice' of Mr Littleton in writing the letter which changed the lord-lieutenant's opinion on the Coercion Bill, without the knowledge of the premier; and they further asked whether any cabinet could be safe with a member in it who could so perplex its councils. The experiment proved a short one.

The liberal party believed that it had gained by the changes in the cabinet; and a more frank and genial spirit of liberalism seemed to spread itself through the government after Lord Melbourne's entrance upon his new office. He was as yet little known in official life; but those who knew him best spoke well of him: he did not suffer under any lack of warning that much had been borne with from Lord Grey that would be fatal to the power of any one else; and the new premier took such warnings in good part. The session was nearly over-a session in which a vast amount of real business had been done, in the midst of all its mistakes and misadventures: the work of the government lay clear before it; and here was the recess just at hand, in which the measures of the next session might be prepared-for nobody dreamed of a change of ministry and of principles of government before the next session could begin. On the whole, Lord Melbourne's administration opened cheerfully; and

CHAP. XII.]

IRISH TITHES-THE GREY BANQUET.

the king's speech, on the 15th of August, was animated in its tone.

The autumn was variously occupied by the leaders of the parties and the destinies of the kingdom. Mr O'Connell published a series of letters to the home secretary which could be of no service to any good cause from their violence of language, and in this case only aggravated the indisposition of his Irish supporters to receive with a fair construction any measures offered by the imperial government. The 'Slaughter of Rathcormack,' which took place in November, and which was a prominent theme with O'Connell during the remainder of his life, might not perhaps have happened if he had not exhorted the people to impatience instead of patience, pending the trial of the government measures in regard to tithe. Some peasants who were opposing the collection of tithe, barred themselves into the yard of a cottage, as an escape from the military who were escorting the clergyman-Archdeacon Ryder-in his tithecollecting excursion. The gate of the yard was forced, the soldiers fired, and thirteen men were killed, and eight wounded. Eleven of the thirteen were fathers of families. The widow paid her tithe, and the archdeacon proceeded to collect his tithes throughout the parish without further molestation.' | He left behind him the people shutting their shops in the village, and driving every cow and pig out of sight for miles round; and bereaved fathers kneeling with clasped hands, to utter curses on the government, civil and ecclesiastical, which brought such desolation in the name of religion. O'Connell lost no time and spared no strength in exasperating the discontent, as if no healing measures had yet been entered upon.

Meantime, the lord chancellor was recreating himself, after a long stretch of arduous business, with a journey in Scotland; before the close of which some incidents occurred which deeply affected a part of the history of future years. He went from town to town, from one public reception to another, opening his mind to any hearers, on any subject; and thus the amount of egotism and indiscretion accumulated in ten days' time so as to fill the newspapers of the day, and fix universal attention. It was on this journey that he declared, at Inverness, that he should let his sovereign know by that night's post how loyal were his subjects in the north of Scotland; a promise which was found not to have been fulfilled. About such proceedings as these men might laugh and be amused; but a scene full of seriousness and significance, and pregnant with political results, took place at Edinburgh, which caused the shedding of many tears in private, and the disappointment of much national hope at a subsequent time. Lord Grey was travelling northwards during this autumn-conveyed in a sort of triumph to his home, and beyond it, to Edinburgh, where a great banquet was given in his honour on the 15th of September. Among the members of his family who attended him was Lord Durham, at once the trusted friend of the old statesman and the beloved of the people. He was the principal framer of the Reform Bill, the consistent advocate of all genuine reforms-a man of the rarest honesty, which

419

took the character of genius for the recognition of truth and right, and for the expression of it. When Lord Grey had earnestly desired his presence in the cabinet in the summer, he was kept out by the lord chancellor and another, and the Liberals in the Commons had expressed their sense of this act by an address to Lord Grey. Notwithstanding these circumstances, the lord chancellor appeared at the Grey banquet at Edinburgh; and nothing, as far as was known, had passed between the honoured guest of that banquet and himself, which need hinder his being present. He made a speech, the most prominent part of which consisted of rebuke to reformers who, in a fretful impatience, endangered all progress by rash attempts to go too fast. His language was so figurative that it is possible that he lost sight, in the pursuit of a succession of metaphors, of the substance of what he meant to convey, or of the impression which it would make on his hearers; but the great body of listeners-who were nearly three thousand-certainly understood him to desire a slackening pace of reform, and less pressure of popular will on the government; and it was in this understanding that Mr Abercromby, Mr Ellice, and Sir J. C. Hobhouse responded to the appeal of Lord Durham, and followed up his speech-the celebrated speech of that day-of which some words passed into a proverb, which sustained the heart and hope of the people at the time, but which, in the end, cost him his life, and set back the great work of colonial reform. The most memorable words of that speech, the words which were received at the moment with an enthusiasm that spread over the whole kingdom, were these: My noble and learned friend, Lord Brougham, has been pleased to give some advice, which I have no doubt he deems very sound, to some classes of persons-I know none such-who evince too strong a desire to get rid of ancient abuses, and fretful impatience in awaiting the remedies of them. Now I frankly confess I am one of those persons who see with regret every hour which passes over the existence of recognised and unreformed abuses.' These words were received with cheers which seemed as if they would never end; and when single voices could be heard, one member of the government after another responded heartily, and said that it was good for public men to witness such scenes and hear such truths; it kept them up to their duty. Among these voices, however, the lord chancellor's was not heard. He sat mute-mute at the moment, but not elsewhere. He travelled fast, and was presently at Salisbury, making a speech of defiance against Lord Durham, in which he challenged him to a meeting in the House of Lords. In the number of the Edinburgh Review which appeared immediately afterwards, there was an article whose authorship was evident enough, and was never denied by either the editor or the presumed writer, which charged Lord Durham with having opposed a thorough reform of parliament in the cabinet, and with the gravest breach of trust-with revealing the secrets of the cabinet. By the Salisbury challenge this quarrel-interesting in itself, as between two eminent liberal leaders-was made a matter of public principle; and it was inevitable that Lord Durham

should be regarded as the stanch reformer that he had ever shewn himself to be, while Lord Brougham offered himself as the representative of the retarding or 'drag' system of government, as it was then called. Hence it was that those words of Lord Durham at the Grey banquet passed immediately into a proverb, and were taken as a text for political discourses, and were seen on banners, and as mottoes to newspapers and tracts. Hence it was, too, that the vindication of Lord Durham's honour became a public concern. It is probable that no one ever doubted his honour; but such a charge as that of betraying cabinet secrets must be met-difficult as it was to do so without a betrayal of cabinet secrets in the act of defence. The thing was done, and well done, at a banquet given to Lord Durham, at Glasgow, on the 29th of October. He there read a letter from Lord Grey which settled the question. Lord Grey declared his opinion that it was impossible for Lord Durham to reveal, for his own justification, anything that had passed in the cabinet; but he offered his own unqualified testimony to Lord Durham's fidelity to his public professions and his official duty. This testimony of the prime-minister was enough; and the past was settled. As for the future, there was to be first a passage of words in the House of Lords. To this men began to look forward eagerly. They saw no further, and little dreamed what consequences of this hostility lay hid in the future. And, as a few days proved, they could not see so far as even the opening of the session. He has been pleased,' said Lord Durham, of his antagonist, 'to challenge me to meet him in the House of Lords. I know well the meaning of the taunt. He is aware of his infinite superiority over me in one respect; and so am I. He is a practised orator, and a powerful debater. I am not. I speak but seldom in parliament, and always with reluctance in an assembly where I meet with no sympathy from an unwilling majority. He knows full well the advantage which he has over me; and he knows, too, that in any attack which he may make on me in the House of Lords, he will be warmly and cordially supported by them. With all these manifold advantages, almost overwhelming, I fear him not, and I will meet him there, if it be unfortunately necessary to repeat what he was pleased to term my "criticisms.' Thus did the ground appear to be prepared for a new assertion of the people's cause, in regard to the reforms remaining to be achieved; but before the time came, the king had interposed-Lord Brougham had taken leave of office, and the Conservative party was in power. The king, it was understood, did not look forward with any satisfaction to the proposed controversy in the House of Lords; and his mind had long been uneasy about the treatment of the Irish Church by the Whig ministry. He seized the occasion of the death of Lord Spencer-by which Lord Althorp was raised to the peerage-to dismiss his ministers, and seek for satisfaction to his mind from the opposite party.

The surprise to the ministers themselves appears to have been great. All that had happened was that Lord Althorp could no longer be chancellor of the exchequer, from his removal to the Upper House.

But Lord Melbourne had an immediate resource in Lord John Russell. He went down to Brighton on the 13th, and remained there till the Friday evening, when he returned to town, to tell his colleagues that the king had sent for the Duke of Wellington. Whether he had anything more to tell-whether he understood any secret causes of a change so sudden-or whether he agreed with the general belief as to the king's apprehensions and dislikes, there is no saying. The one fact of the case avowed by Lord Melbourne was, that he was taken by surprise—the cordiality of the king towards himself having never been interrupted.

The event occasioned a prodigious sensation, abroad as well as at home. French politics were forgotten at Paris; and on the quays of New York, New Orleans, and Boston, men stood in groups to read the papers or discuss the news. Here was an experiment of a recurrence to principles of government which had been solemnly, and with much sacrifice on every hand, disavowed by the British nation. The most interesting spectacle to the world now was of the success or failure of the experiment. Those who looked at the weakness and faults of the Whig administrations of the last four years believed it would succeed. Those who looked deeper-into the mind, so lately declared, of the English peopleknew that it would fail. But the suspense was exciting and painful—more exciting and painful than people could believe a year afterwards; for it was not long before the Whigs were in again, with Lord Melbourne at their head, but not with Lord Brougham on the woolsack. Lord Brougham now finally left office, after having held the great seal four years. He did not, however, acquiesce at the moment in the relinquishment of all office. The Duke of Wellington could not fill up all the appointments for some time, as Sir Robert Peel's presence was indispensable, and Sir Robert Peel was at Rome; but the lord chancellor must clearly be Lord Lyndhurst, and he was appointed at once-on the 21st of November. Lord Brougham immediately wrote to him, to offer to take, without salary, the office of chief-baron, actually held by Lord Lyndhurst. The application did not succeed. Lord Lyndhurst could say nothing till the return of Sir Robert Peel; and before that return, Lord Brougham had withdrawn his request. The public voice on this act was not to be mistaken. Lord Brougham pleaded that his intention was to save £12,000 a year to the country, and to spare suitors the evils of a double appeal; but this last object, of the abolition of the vice-chancellorship, he had not pursued during the four years when the power of chancery reform was in his hands; and as for the saving of salary, the general feeling was that it would have been no compensation for the evil of the 'political immorality' of taking office under the Conservatives, in a manner which indicated confidence in their remaining in power. Lord Brougham therefore withdrew his application; but not before the act had affected his political reputation in foreign countries, where all preceding inconsistencies had been allowed for, or unrecognised.

In reviewing his four years of office, the most agree

CHAP. XII.]

LORD BROUGHAM'S LAW REFORMS.

able point to dwell upon is his activity in his function, and in the cause of law reform. In the summer of 1830, he had brought forward a bill for the establishment of courts of local jurisdiction in certain districts, intended to apply afterwards to the whole of the kingdom. By this measure it was hoped that justice would be rendered cheap and easy of attainment in a number of cases where it could not be had by multitudes, unless brought near their doors. As soon as he was in office-in December 1830-Lord Brougham brought forward this measure in the House of Peers, where it was laid on the table for consideration, being, as Lord Lyndhurst testified, an affair of the very highest importance-one consideration being that it would create fifty new courts, with fifty new judges and their establishments. To the great grief of its author, and of all who intelligently wished that justice should be accessible to every citizen, this which was called, both lightly and seriously, the Poor Man's Bill, was thrown out by the Lords on the 9th of July 1833. The rejection of the measure was believed to be owing to the fear that it would draw away too much business from the higher courts, impose too much expense, and yield too much patronage. In the session of 1833, Lord Brougham brought in a bill, which was passed by the Commons on the 22d of August, for abolishing thirteen offices in the Court of Chancery, and reducing others, effecting altogether a saving of about £70,000. Lord Eldon did not think he should be able to persuade himself to go down to parliament again-he had, as God knew, too little strength to spend on an attendance utterly hopeless; and it weighed him down more than he could endure, to observe what was going on there, and how. This was written while waiting upon the progress of this bill, vindicating his own conduct' the while, and objecting to the haste' with which parliament was abolishing thirteen sinecures which had flourished under his own eye. Alas! there was other haste to object to-in the chancellor's judicial function. The clearance of business that he effected in the Court of Chancery was such as to make his predecessor feel as if the iron mace,' that Sydney Smith spoke of, were swinging about his ears. For twenty-five long years,' said Sydney Smith, just after the coming in of the Grey ministry, 'did Lord Eldon sit in that court, surrounded with misery and sorrow, which he never held up a finger to alleviate. The widow and the orphan cried to him, as vainly as the towncrier cries when he offers a small reward for a full purse; the bankrupt of the court became the lunatic of the court; estates mouldered away, and mansions fell down; but the fees came in, and all was well. But in an instant the iron mace of Brougham shivered to atoms this house of fraud and of delay.' And it is true that from that hour we have heard no more of the delays in the Court of Chancery being ruinous to property, as well as trying to the patience. true, also, that there was at the time, and has been It is since, much impugning of the quality of the judgments which were dispensed so industriously and so promptly. However this may be-whatever might be true about Lord Brougham's qualifications for such a post of judicial decision-there can be no

[ocr errors]

421

question of the benefit to the country, after so long a rule of Lord Eldon's, of the clearance which was made by Lord Brougham. At another period, the quality of the judge's law must be the first consideration then, and for once, there was something more important that racked minds should be eased, and unsettled minds certified; that a vast amount of deteriorating property should be restored to use and good management; and that the reproach of the highest court of the realm-the reproach of being a bottomless pit of perdition-should cease. Brougham's farewell to the court, on the 21st of In Lord November, he said, after lamenting the compulsion which obliged him to give up the seals in haste: 'I have the greatest satisfaction in reflecting that this court, represented by its enemies as the temple of discord, delay, and expense, has been twice closed within the space of five months.' He went on to ascribe the merit of this to the vice-chancellor and late master of the rolls, and also to the bar; but these functionaries all existed in Lord Eldon's days, and did not save the court from its reproach. Lord Brougham was himself the spring of their activity, as Lord Eldon had been the check upon it; and Lord Brougham was doubtless entitled to the satisfaction he naturally expressed on this parting occasion. As for the rest, it is not necessary here to enter into the controversy between himself and his contemporaries as to the share he had in promoting some good measures and defeating others. 'I should be only fatiguing you,' he wrote to Mr Bulwer, were I to name the other measures of large and uncompromising reform with which my name is connected.' There were, indeed, many popular interests in former years with which his name was connected; and it should not, and will not, be forgotten, amidst speculations on his short official career, that in early and unpromising days, the most conspicuous advocate of political reforms, and of slavery, and of tyranny in every form, was the Henry education, and the most effectual denouncer of negro Brougham who, in 1834, was sighing for that position among commoners in which he had won his fame. At public meetings in London, and latterly in Scotland, he earnestly put forward his regrets that he had ever quitted the scene of his triumphs, the House of Commons, and his longing to 'undo the patent' of his nobility; and there were many who lamented that he should ever have left the ranks of opposition. Such now hailed his retirement from office, and the clear indications of circumstances that the retirement was final; for they had a lingering expectation that, though in another House, he might resume his old habits, and be again the hope of the oppressed, and a terror to tyranny in high places.

6

Lord Althorp, now become Lord Spencer, was thus soon at liberty to enter upon the privacy he sighed for. He never returned to office. Perhaps no man ever left the House of Commons and an official seat about whom there was so little difference of opinion among all parties. Nobody supposed him an able statesman; and nobody failed to recognise his candour, his love of justice, his simplicity of heart, and his kindliness and dignity of temper and

manners.

CHAPTER XIII.

HE affairs of France during this period were only less interesting to the English than their own; and the proceedings of England were commented on by French statesmen of every party from day to day. English Conservatives found cause for apprehension, during the whole struggle for reform, that we were proceeding pari passu with the revolutionists of France; and English Liberals watched with interest whether it

was so, while French affairs were undecided. The eyes of the world were fixed on Louis Philippe, Duke of Orleans, from the moment when he accepted the office of lieutenant-general of the kingdom, before Charles X. and the Dauphin sent in their abdication, and set forth for exile. This Louis Philippe, whose father had died on the scaffold in the first revolution, who had known the depths of poverty, and been long lost in obscurity, was now at the head of the French nation; and it was a spectacle of eager interest how he would conduct himself there. He had walked, almost barefooted, over the Alps, and had taught mathematics in a school in Switzerland. He had lived humbly on the banks of the Thames; he had been a modest resident in Philadelphia, where

[graphic]
[graphic][subsumed]

he had fallen in love with a lady whose father refused his addresses as a match too inferior for his daughter; and he was now the centre of order in France, and the hope of all who craved the continuance of monarchy, and also of those who desired a safe and firm republic. The abdication of the king was placed in his hands at eleven o'clock of the night of the 2d of August; and the next day, he opened the session of the chambers, which met punctually according to the order of the late king, given some months before.

His speech declared his disinclination to his present prominent position, but his willingness, as that position

was assigned him by the will of the nation, to accept all its consequences-all the consequences of a free government. He pointed out to the chambers the subjects which it was necessary for them to consider first; and especially the fourteenth article of the charter, of which the late ministers had availed themselves to assume that the king had a power beyond the law, when a crisis should render the observance of the law incompatible with regal rule. While delivering this speech, he stood on the platform covered with crimson velvet, strewn over with golden fleurs-de-lis, and with the tricolored flag waving over his head. It was observed that he left

« PreviousContinue »