Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Springfield & Ill. S. E. Ry. Co. v. County Clerk of Wayne Co. 74 Ill.

27....

852 Sprott v. Reid, 3 G. Greene, 489.... 453 S. S. Osborne, The, 105 U. S. 451.... 425 Stafford v. Union Bank of Louisiana,

16 How. 135; 17 How. 275........ 919 Stanley v. Colt, 5 Wall. 119, 169.... 344 Stanton v. Embry, 46 Conn. 595.. 34 Stark v. Starrs, 6 Wall. 402.. State v. Arlin, 39 N. H. 179. State v. Babcock, 1 Vroom, 29 State v. Ball, 27 Mo. 327...

678

465

896

446

State v. Barker, 18 Vt. 195.... 525
State v. Burke, 33 La. Ann. 498; 9
Wheat. 859....
135, 153
State v. Chapman, 11 Ohio, 430.. 583
State v. Foreman, 3 Mo. 602...... 583
State v. Jumel, 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 128.
103, 177, 178
State v. Keith, 63 N. C. 140.....451, 464
State v. Kring, 71 Mo. 551..
445
State v. Norvill, 2 Yerg. 24; 9 Yerg.

337.... 446 State v. Ross, 29 Mo. 32. .445, 446, 457 State v. Sims, 71 Mo. 538. 457 State v. Smith, 53 Mo. 139.......446, 457 State v. Sneed, 25 Tex. (Supp.) 66... 451 State v. Squire, 26 lowa, 340.. State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535.. State v. Town of Union, 4 Vroom, 351...

216 445

Sumner v. Hicks, 2 Black, 532.....
Sun Ins. Co. v. Ocean Ins. Co. 1
Sup. Ct. Rep. 582...
Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S.
499; 103 U. S. 554..
Supervisors v. United States, 18
Wall. 81, 82..

758

.291, 922

[blocks in formation]

.....

22

[ocr errors]

22

399

Suter v. Hilliard, 132 Mass. 412 ... 345 Suydam v. Williamson, 24 How. 433; S. C. 6 Wall. 736.. Swift v. Smith, 102 U. S. 444. Swift v. Tyson, 16 Pet. 1, 18-20...22, 714 Sybil, The, 4 Wheat. 98 758 Syrian, The, 2 Marit. Law Cas. 387.. 756 Talbot v. Seeman, 1 Cranch, 1, 42.. 756 Talmage v. Chapel, 16 Mass. 71..... 642 Taylor v. Caldwell, 3 Best & S. 826.. 752 Taylor v. King, 6 Munf. 358........ 817 Taylor v. Taintor, 16 Wall. 366..... 888 Taylor v. Thompson, 42 Ill. 11..... 364 Tennessee v. Davis, 100 U. S. 257... 639 Tennessee v. Sneed, 96 U. S. 69.. 96, 102, 116, 125, 453 Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628, 633... .96, 859 Thacher's Distilled Spirits, 103 U. S. 679

...

395

State v. Wheeling Bridge Co. 13 How. 518..

744

Tharp v. Fitz, 6 B. Mon. 6.
Thatcher v. Powell, 6 Wheat. 127... 22
Thayer v. Stearns, 1 Pick. 109.... 326
Thomas v. Harvie's Heirs, 10 Wheat.

481 786

[blocks in formation]

146...... 651 Thomas v. Osborn, 19 How. 30...... 700 Thomas v. Railroad Co. 101 U. S. 71. 223 Thomas v. Richmond, 12 Wall. 349, 356......

State Tonnage Tax Cases, The, 12 Wall. 212. 266 Steadman v. Wilbur, 7 R. I. 481.... 355 Steam-ship Co. v. Port-wardens, 6 Wall. 31, 34.

.266, 737 Steinman, Ex parte, 95 Pa. 220, 229, 237... ..574, 584, 606 Stephens v. Hill, 10 Mees. & W. 28, 31, 32... .579, 580, 608, 610 Stetson v. O'Sullivan, 8 Allen, 321.. 355 Stevens v. Pratt, 101 Ill. 207.. 946 Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U. S. 505..715, 716 Stewart v. Otoe Co. 2 Neb. 177.. 66 Stimpson v. Woodman, 10 Wall. 117. 667 Stone v. Gardner, 20 Ill. 309.... Stout v. Cook, 47 Ill. 530.... Strader v. Graham, 10 How. 82... Stringfellow v. Cain, 99 U. S. 610... 680 Stuart v. Maxwell, 16 How. 160....

...

69 Thompson v. Armstrong, 5 Ala. 383. 715 Thompson v. Lee Co. 3 Wall. 330 365 Thomson v. Lee, 3 Wall. 330. 22 Thomson v. Shakespeare, H. R. V. Johns. 612; 1 De Gex, F. & J.399. 349 Tillinghast v. Wheaton, 8 R. I. 536. 422 Tintsman v. Nat. Bank, 100 U. S. 6. 430 Town of Coloma v. Eaves, 92 U. S. 484...... 713 Town of Danville v. Pace, 25 Grat. 1. 413 Town of Elgin v. Marshall, 106 U. S. 578; S. C. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484. 670 Town of Thompson v. Perrine, 103 U. S. 816; S. C. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep..564, 568, (106 U. S.).

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Page Vattier v. Hinde, 7 Pet. 263, 264.... 167 Vidal v. Girard, 2 How. 127..331, 341, 349 Virginia, Ex parte, 100 U. S. 341.... 864 Viser v. Scruggs, 49 Miss. 705. 788 Von Hoffman v. Quincy, 4 Wall. 553 96 Vrede, The, Lush. 322.. 757 Walker v. Powers, 104 U. S. 245..... 819 Walker v. Robbins, 14 How. 584... 32 Walker v. United States, 4 Wall. 163.. 429 Walker v. Walker, 25 Ga. 420...... 342 Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314, 317.. 95, 96, 113, 117, 126, 160 Walls, Ex parte, 64 Ind. 461..

Union Trust Co. v Souther, 2 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 295......
.298, 299
United States v. Alexander, 12 Wall.
177..

497
United States v. Bailey, 9 Pet. 238.. 511
United States v. Briggs, 5 How. 208. 685
United States v. Britton, 2 Sup. Ct.
Rep. 512, 531.
526, 535, 536
United States v. Buzzo, 18 Wall. 125.
525, 536
United States v. Carll, 105 U. S. 611. 517
United States v. Cook, 17 Wall. 168. 521
United States v. Coolidge, 1 Wheat.
415.....
535

United States v. Dashiel, 3 Wall. 688.....

29

[blocks in formation]

United States v. Forty-three Gallons
of Whisky, 93 U. Š. 192...
908
United States v. Fox, 94 U.S. 325.333, 341
United States v. Hall, 2 Wash. C. C.
366; 6 Cranch, 171.... .449, 455
United States v. Hudson, 7 Cranch,
32..
535
United States v. Mills, 7 Pet. 138.... 517
United States v. Montell, Taney, C.
C. 47..
891
United States v. Moore, 95 U. S. 768. 497
United States v. Morrison, 4 Pet. 136 22
United States v. Pond, 2 Curt. 265.. 518
United States v. Pugh, 99 U. S. 265, 497
United States v. Sherman, 98 U. S.
565...

829

[blocks in formation]

United States v. Throckmorton, 98
U.S.61...

803 567, 712 Vallett v. Parker, 6 Wend. 615...... 715 Vance v. Campbell, 1 Black, 427..823, 824 Van Hostrop v. Madison City, 1 Wall. 291.. .472, 502 Vannevar v. Bryant, 21 Wall. 41... 686 Van Rensselaer v. Kearney, 11 How. 318.....

United States v. Tynen, 11 Wall. 88

22

Van Vechten v. Hopkins, 5 Johns.

211.....

519

582, 587, 612 Walsingham Packet, The, 2 C. Rob. 77, 87..... 204 Walton v. Cotton, 19 How. 355..... 43 Ward v. Maryland, 12 Wall. 418, 432 741, 744 Warnock v. Davis, 104 U. S. 779.... 952 Warren v. Anderson, 8 Scott, 384... 323 Water-meter Co. v. Desper, 101 U. S. 332, 337....... 826 Watkins, Ex parte, 7 Pet. 572...... 864 Watson v. Mercer, 8 Pet. 88, 110..414, 947 Watson v. Tarpley, 18 How. 517, 519. 22, 714 Webster v. Cooper, 14 How. 504.... 22 Weightman v. Clark, 103 U. S. 259. 364 Welch v. Wadsworth, 30 Conn. 149. 413 Wells v. Calnan, 107 Mass. 514 753 Wells v. Sup'rs, 102 U. S. 630...... 366 Welton v. State, 91 U. S. 275....... 192, 741, 744 Westerlo v. De Witt, 36 N. Y. 340.. 422 Wetter v. Habersham, 60 Ga. 193, 194, 203... Wheeler v. Smith, 9 How. 55...331, 341 Whicker v. Hume, 7 H. L. Cas. 124, 141, 155..... 335 White v. Arthur, 10 Fed. Rep. 80... 828, 829 White v. City of Lincoln, 5 Neb. 505516.... White v. Hart, 13 Wall. 652.. Whiting v. Bank of U. S. 13 Pet. 15. 651 Whitney v. Bartholomew, 21 Conn.

213..

....

340

218

169

731

Whitney v. Wyman, 101 U. S. 392.. 801
Whitney's Case, 18 N. B. R. 563.... 407
Wilkins v. Ellett, 9 Wall. 740. 643
William Brandt, Jr., The, 2 Notes
Cas. Supp. lxviii..
757
Williams v. Armroyd, 7 Cranch, 423. 204
Williams v. Norris, 12 Wheat. 117.. 944
Williams v. Town of Roberts, 88 Ill.
21....
620
Williams v. Wilkes, 14 Pa. St. 228.. 31
Williamson v. Berry, 8 How. 558,
559....
22
344

Vathir v. Zane, 6 Grat. 246......... 715 | Willis v. Brown, 2 Jur. 987..

[blocks in formation]

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

OCTOBER TERM, 1882.

(106 U. S. 571)

JENKINS, Assignee, etc., v. INTERNATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO and

others.

(January 29, 1883.)

JUDGMENT IN STATE COURT-WRIT OF ERROR-SUIT BY ASSIGNEE IN BANKRUPTCY-STATUTORY LIMITATIONS.

Where a judgment in a state court is rendered against one who is shortly thereafter declared to be a bankrupt, a writ of error to that judgment, sued out by the assignee, is a suit brought by such assignee within the meaning of section 5057 of the Revised Statutes.

The limitation of time in that section applies to suits by the assignee to recover debts and other moneyed obligations, as well as to controversies concerning adverse interests in property, more strictly speaking.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.

W. T. Burgess, for plaintiff in error.

A. M. Pence and Julius Rosenthal, for defendants in error. MILLER, J. This is a writ of error to the supreme court of Illinois. In the course of a complicated litigation between Samuel J. Walker and his creditors, it became a question whether the International

« PreviousContinue »