What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acquired action Affirming agreement alleged Amendment amount Answer Appeals application Argument association authority Bank bill capital carried cause Cherokee Circuit Court citizens claim combination common competing competition condition Congress Constitution construction contract corporation County created decided decision decree defendant Delawares denied determined direct directors effect entered exercise existence fact Federal follows foreign give given Government grant held holding individual intended interstate commerce issued judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE lake land limits lines matter means Michigan nature North Northern Pacific Northern Securities Company officers Ohio operation Opinion organized owner ownership pany parties passed persons petition plaintiff in error present provisions purchase question Railroad Company Railway Railway Company reason referred regulate respect restraint result road rule shares statute stockholders suit Supreme Court thereof tion trade trust United violation vote York
Page 336 - Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 196, 6 L. ed. 23, 70, where he said: "We are now arrived at the inquiry, What is this power? It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.
Page 320 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover three-fold the damages by him sustained, and the costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. "Sec. 8. The word 'person,
Page 271 - Section 1 provides that every contract combination in the form of a trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal.
Page 630 - Class legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation which, in carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within /the amendment.
Page 336 - We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution, which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it in the manner most beneficial to the people.
Page 88 - ... due process of law, however obnoxious it may be to other objections.
Page 486 - Malice in common acceptation means ill will against a person, but in its legal sense it means a wrongful act, done intentionally, without just cause or excuse.
Page 425 - But no law shall ^ -authorize the construction or operation of a street railroad except upon the condition that the consent of the owners of one-half in value of the property bounded on, and the consent also of the local authorities having the control of, that portion of a street or highway upon which it is proposed to construct or operate such railroad be first obtained...
Page 602 - This title does not affect actions against directors or stockholders of a corporation, to recover a penalty or forfeiture imposed, or to enforce a liability created by law; but such actions must be brought within three years after the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts upon which the penalty or forfeiture attached, or the liability was created.
Page 353 - It may be doubted whether any of the evils proceeding from the feebleness of the federal government contributed more to that great revolution which introduced the present system than the deep and general conviction that commerce ought to be regulated by congress.