« PreviousContinue »
Richard Grafton appears to have been descended of a good family, and to have been born in London, about the close of the reign of Henry VII. He had probably a liberal education, since it appears by his writings, that he understood the languages. He practised the art of printing in the successive reigns of Henry VIII. Edward VI. queen Mary, and of Elizabeth. By company, he was a grocer, as he subscribes himself in a letter to the lord Cromwell, dated 1537. The same year, too, he first appears as a printer in London ; a profession he first engaged in, from his being applied to, to procure an edition of Tyndal's Testament, and afterwards of his Bible revised by Coverdale. He might possibly have been induced also, like several other persons of education in that age, by a desire to promote the progress of ancient learning, as well as of the reformation. He was the printer of Matthews' Bible.
Grafton dwelt in a part of the dissolved house of the Grey Friars, which was afterwards granted by Edward VI. as an hospital for the maintenance and education of orphans, called Christ's Hospital. On the death of Edward VI. he was employed, from his office of king's printer, to print the proclamation, by which the lady Jane Grey was declared successor to the crown. For thus discharging simply the duty of his office, he was deprived of his patent, and forfeited a debt of 3001. due to him from the crown. He was also prosecuted and imprisoned for the same ostensible cause; though more probably from his attachment to the principles of the reformers.
There was a Richard Grafton, grocer, member of parliament for London 1553 and 1554 ; and again, 1556 and 1557; but that this person was the same with the printer appears somewhat inconsistent with his imprisonment just mentioned. Grafton the member was afterwards returned for Coventry.
During his imprisonment, or at least, while he was driven from his profession of a printer,
he An for meget i he Cronicles of Encad: f vines were jave been seterad mpressions fints ars, that ie bad seen ire. Jointe 3. Tyri-bose T 1362, 1.589, s. , mu 373
Tiere indeas to jave jean some pique between Gration and Join Stow, the historian of London, &c. orgnacny probabix in a spirit of rivalry: for Grartun, in die dedication of his editions of 1570 an urg, affects to speak with contempt of the labours of bis brother historian, whose Chronice, he said, was composed of “The memories of superstitious foundations, tables, and lies toolshly STOWED together, &e. Stow, in the next edition of his Chronicle, retorted this ceasure upon Grafton; charging him with making Edward Hall's Chronicle, his own; and with falsifying Harding's Chronicle, in several instances, when he printed it in 1543. As we are na turally interested in the veracity of our early Chroniclers, it is proper that we should hear what Grafton has to say of himself in vindication. This vindication is contained in the epistle to the reader, in the edition of Richard Grafton to the gentle reader.
I have (right loving reader) now once again turned over my first abridgement of Chronicles, and not only amended such things as I found amiss therein, but also have added thereunto many and divers good notes, as the diligent reader shall easily perceive. And my trust is, that as I am not desirous to offend any person, neither by naming or misreporting of their doings; so I shall be favourably (without reproachful or malicious taunts and biting terms) allowed of, as my labours deserve. But yet, gentle reader, this one thing offendeth me so much, that I am enforced to purge myself thereof, and shew my simple and plain dealing therein.. One John Stow-of whom I will say no evil, although he hath greatly provoked me thereunto, as by writing of an epistle against me, stuffed with ragged eloquence and uncourteous terms, descanting and defining my name, &c.--and now of late the same man hath published a book, which he nameth a summary of the Chronicles of England, (the untruths whereof I will not here detect) and therein hath charged me bitterly, but chiefly with two things. The one, that I have made Edward Hall's Chronicle my Chronicle, but not without mangling, and (as he saith) without any
.11Lentious and plain declaration thereof. The other any that he chargeth me withal, is in praising i von Ilarding, one of his authors (who surely rutin di great praise, and I wish he had follow
lis Jouk no worse author). Ile saith, that a Sygicies of Harding's which he hath, doth much
Tein the Chronicle, which under the said told to tedy si Hudne was printed by me, as though I we had Harding's Chronicle. For answer to
og I have be made Hall's Chronicle my Pse daddition withough the greatest part of the same www (htunele, and written with bujne own
wala u hittle noweth Stuw vf Hall's Chro
dodatne indo wyn I have not aside Hall's tai sis in the mouches noiviler ve I used his tanssi dans lade's the same Pilania obe i Chronicles; Ano adstil the policemaniaka witte sier him to
ne teid, en kage him as 1 a od telesna Lugnet not in every Hotels
ALICA PRE the chiefest
Wish when I found Llob Herit 'thasage by a beavathis, there I al
beneden olan taid. And thus in Wernd Being and none other.
Admin that I do re
od now dead, as Wodine imati with whom I
isi am as ready to