« PreviousContinue »
2. There is humilitas quædam in ritio. If a man does noi take notice of that excellency and perfection that is in himself, how can he be thankful to God, who is the author of all excellency and perfection? Nay, 11 a man bath ton mean an opinion of himself, it wili render hin unserviceable both to God and
3. Pride may be allowed to this or that degree, else a man cannot keep up his dignity. In gluttons there nust be eating, in drunkenness there must be dimnikmy; it is not the eating, nor it is not the dunking, that is to be blained, but the excess. in
All might go well in the commonwealth, if every one in the parliament would lay down his own interest, and aim at the general good. If a man was sick, and the whole college of physicians should come to him, and administer to him severally, haply so long as they observed the rules of art, he might recover; but it one of them had a great deal of scammony by bim, he must put off that, therefore he prescribes scammony ; another had a great deal of shubarb, and he must put off that, and therefore he prescribes rhubard, &c. they would certainly kill the man. We destroy the commonwealth, while we preserve our own private interests, and neglect the public.
1. A king is a thing men have made for their own sakes, for quietness sake. Just as in a family one man is appointed to buy the meat; if every man should buy, or if there were many buyers, they would never agree; one would buy what the other liked not, or what the other had bought before, so there would be a confusion. But that charge being committed to one, he, according to his discretion, pleases all. If they have not what they would have one day, they shall have it the next, or something as good.
2. The word king directs our eyes. Suppose it had been consul or dictator. To think all kings alike, is the same folly, as if a consul of Aleppo or Smyrna, should claim to himself the same power that à consul of Rome. What, am not I consul ? Or a duke of England should think himself like the duke of Florence. Nor can it be imagined that the word B20.2.us did signify the same in Greek, as the Hebrew word'732 did with the Jews. Be sides, let the divines in their pulpits say what they will, they in their practice deny, that all is the king's. They sue him, and so does all the nation whereof they are a part. What matter is it, then, what they preach or teach in the schools ?
3. Kings are all individual, this or that king; there is no species of kings.
4. A king that claims privileges in his own country, because they have them in another, is just as a cook, that claims fees in one lord's house, because they are allowed in another. If the master of the house will yield them, well and good.
5. The text, Render unto Cæsar, the things that are Cæsar's, makes as much against kings as for them; for it says plainly, that some things are not Cæsar's. But divines make choice of it, first in flattery, and then because of the other part adjoined to it, Render unto God the things that are God's, where they bring in the church.
6. A king outed of his country, that takes as much upon him as he did at home in his own court, is as if a man on high, and I being upon the ground, used to lift up my voice to him, that he might hear me, at length should come down, and then expects I should speak as loud to him as I did before,
Selden was a man of very extensive learning; he is styled, even by the learned Grotius,
“ the honour of the English nation;" a compliment, which from ihe literary celebrity of the bestower, he is said to have prized alove all other marks of consideration.
But his language is little deserving of commendation. It has been observed, that it is a mixture of all that is bad, as well as good, in the Latin language. A still worse fault is, that his method is often perplexed and ovscure. Yet his writings are replete with erudition and rati nal observation ; circumstances which stamp a value upon them, which the direct opposites of the defects mentioned, unaccompanied by real information, could never have bestowed. Bacon had so high an opinion of Selden, that he desired by his will, his advice should be ralen respecting the publication or suppression of his own MS. treatises.
I have placed James in the rear of the wore thies which honoured his reign, not precisely (as Hume states it) because that is his place when considered as an author; but because I happened not to get his article in time to come first.
The English works of James I. were published in 1616, folio, by James, bishop of Winton, and dean of his majesty's Chapel Royal. The several pieces contained in the volume are:
1. A Paraphrase upon the Revelation.
2. Two Meditations: the first upon the 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th verses of the 20th chap. of the Revelation: the second upon the 25th, 26th, 27th, 28th, and 29th verses of the 15th ehap. of the first book of the Chronicles.