...opinion of the Court except as to Part III. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 (1963), this Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment." The issue in the present case concerns the standard of materiality to be applied in determining...

...guilty of crimes for which they had been sentenced to death. The Brady court held that the suppression of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates...punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith "In re Simone Fruit Co. , 53 Agric. Dec. 537 (1994) (Ruling on Certified Question); In re AP Holt (Decision...

...Wilde v. Wyoming, 362 US 607. Cf. Durky v. Mayo, 351 US 277, 285 (dissenting opinion). We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. The principle of Mooney v. Holohan is not punishment of society for misdeeds of a prosecutor but avoidance...

...included in its statement of the controlling principle a reference to counsel's request — "We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. . . ." 3 — I see no reason to make the result turn on the adventitious circumstance of a request....

...preliminary hearing is discovery of the prosecution's witness and evidence. In Brady, the court held that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable...due process where the evidence is material either to the guilt or to punishment of the accused, irrespective of the good faith or Imd faith of the prosecution....

...v. Maryland, 373 US 83 (1963), and hence must be preserved. In Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." (373 US at 87.) We have previously held that the formal memoranda of interviews conducted by IRS agents...

...States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83, 104, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 1196-1197, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215, held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." Thus, Brady requires the...

...defendant. Brady v. Maryland soys that all material "favorable to an accused . . . where the evidence ia material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." oust be supplied to defendant and_hia counsel: Thus, • worthy prosecutorial motive in secreting tapes...

...just as does this ruling, and direct quotation from Justice Brcnnan's opinion is helpful: . ... ". . . the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon rcrucst violates due iiroci-gs tji^icc^rlK gyi Joiicc in coi-.-rln1 either to ^1'fl'. j*r :•) ;v:r...

...v. Maryland, 373 US 83 (1963), and hence must be preserved. In Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." (373 US at 87.) We have previously held that the formal memoranda of interviews conducted by IRS agents...