...United States." 429 US 975. In Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 US 280, 304 (1976), this Court held that "the fundamental respect for humanity underlying the...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death." In Stanislaus Roberts, supra, we made clear that this principle applies even where the crime of first-degree...

...committed. These factors are properly part of the sentencing process. "[T]he sentencing process must permit consideration of the 'character and record of the...the process of inflicting the penalty of death.'" *See White v. Maryland, 470 US 1062 (1985) (dissenting from denial of certiorari); Maxwell v. Pennsylvania,...

...humanity underlying the Eighth Amendment, see Trnr> v. Dtillfs, 356 US, at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of the character and record...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death. For the reasons stated, we conclude that the death sentences imposed upon the petitioners under North...

...humanity underlying the Eighth Amendment, see Trori v. Dulles, 356 US, at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of the character and record...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death. For the reasons stated, we conclude that the death sentences imposed upon the petitioners under North...

...Trop v. Dulles, supra, at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of aspects of the character of the individual offender and the circumstances of...constitutionally indispensable part of the process of imposing the ultimate punishment of death. The North Carolina statute impermissibly treats all persons...

...Trap \. Dulles, supra, at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of aspects of the character of the individual offender and the circumstances of...constitutionally indispensable part of the process of imposing the ultimate punishment of death. The North Carolina statute impermissibly treats all persons...

...invalidating North Carolina's mandatory death penalty statute, that the sentencing process must permit consideration of the "character and record of the...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death," Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 US, at 304, in order to ensure the reliability, under Eighth Amendment...

...for humanity underlying the Eighth Amendment, see Trop v. Dulles. 356 US at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of the character and record...of the process of Inflicting the penalty of death. "This conclusion rests squarely on the predicate that the penalty of death Is qualitatively different...

...that they omitted, "the fundamental respect for humanity underlying the 8th Amendment. . . . which requires consideration of the character and record...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death" (Woodson v. North Carolina 1976:2991). In Gregg, they explained: In summary the concerns expressed...

...for humanity underlying the Eighth Amendment, see Trop v. Dulles, 356 US at 100 (plurality opinion), requires consideration of the character and record...of the process of inflicting the penalty of death. "This conclusion rests squarely on the predicate that the penalty of death is qualitatively different...