...ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 18 NY 543, the Court of...

...ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." Now, that was a case in which the negligence proved was that the plaintiff, who was...

...ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The following cases selected at random from a much longer list, will serve to illustrate...

...ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care."8 If a passenger in the train of a common carrier is injured by the derailment of the...

...in the ordinary course does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from the want of proper care.' The burden of proof on the issue of negligence is not changed by this rule....

...ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence in the absence of explanation by the defendant that the accident arose from want of care." The learned judge said that under the old law there would have been a good defence to...

...ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident aro e from want of care. 13. COLLISION is DAYLIGHT — PRESUMPTION.— When the collision occur? in...

...ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The learned counsel for appellant disagrees to these propositions only in saying that...

...ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. This case is cited, with approbation, in Transportation Co. v. Downer, 11 Wall. 129....

...ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation...defendant that the accident arose from a want of care." The case of Oee V. Metropolitan R. Co., L. &., 8 QB 161, is very similar to that of Kearney v. London,...