Pacific Coast Law Journal: Containing All the Decisions of the Supreme Court of California, and the Important Decisions of the U.S. Circuit and U.S. District Courts for the District of California, and of the U.S. Supreme Court and Higher Courts of Other States, Volume 2W. T. Baggett and Company, 1879 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page
... United States vs. Throckmorton et al ... 368 322 United States vs. Central Pacific R. R. Co .. 482 341 United States vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co ..... 482 Palmer vs. Low .... 383 United States vs. Union Pacific People vs. Van Delear 25 ...
... United States vs. Throckmorton et al ... 368 322 United States vs. Central Pacific R. R. Co .. 482 341 United States vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co ..... 482 Palmer vs. Low .... 383 United States vs. Union Pacific People vs. Van Delear 25 ...
Page 1
... United States Supreme Court decisions applicable to the Pacific States ; also , the important decisions of the State of Nevada . Supreme Court of California . JULY TERM . [ No. 6,045 . ] [ Filed August 17 , 1878. ] EX PARTE WILLIAM ...
... United States Supreme Court decisions applicable to the Pacific States ; also , the important decisions of the State of Nevada . Supreme Court of California . JULY TERM . [ No. 6,045 . ] [ Filed August 17 , 1878. ] EX PARTE WILLIAM ...
Page 12
... the State's attorney having in fact appeared , does not change the phase of the question at all . It has been decided in at least two cases by the Supreme Court of the United States , 12 THE PACIFIC COAST LAW JOURNAL .
... the State's attorney having in fact appeared , does not change the phase of the question at all . It has been decided in at least two cases by the Supreme Court of the United States , 12 THE PACIFIC COAST LAW JOURNAL .
Page 13
... United States , that the appearance by the United States attorney , without authority , does not give jurisdiction over the United States . In the case of the United States vs. McLemore ( Howard , 286 ) , an action was brought in ...
... United States , that the appearance by the United States attorney , without authority , does not give jurisdiction over the United States . In the case of the United States vs. McLemore ( Howard , 286 ) , an action was brought in ...
Page 14
... United States vs. McLemore , in 4 Howard , 286 , where it is broadly laid down as the law , that a Circuit Court can not entertain a bill on the equity side of the court , praying that the United States may be perpetually injoined from ...
... United States vs. McLemore , in 4 Howard , 286 , where it is broadly laid down as the law , that a Circuit Court can not entertain a bill on the equity side of the court , praying that the United States may be perpetually injoined from ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed alleged allowed amended amount answer appeal application attorney authority bank bill Board bond California cause claim Code complaint considered Constitution construction contract corporation counsel County creditors damages decided decision decree deed defendant denied District Court duty effect entered entitled evidence exceptions execution fact filed findings give given grant ground held interest issued Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land limits March matter ment mining mortgage motion necessary notice objection opinion owner paid party passed patent payment person petition plaintiff portion possession present proceedings proper purchase question railroad reason received record recover refused respect respondent rule San Francisco sold statute street suit Supreme Court taken tion trial United valid void wood writ
Popular passages
Page 323 - ... and the right of way for the construction of ditches and canals for the purposes herein specified is acknowledged and confirmed ; but whenever any person, in the construction of any ditch or canal, injures or damages the possession of any settler on the public domain, the party committing such injury or damage shall be liable to the party injured for such injury or damage.
Page 199 - It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care, and considered in its full extent. Other principles which may serve to illustrate...
Page 323 - That whenever by priority of possession rights to the use of water for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes have vested and accrued and the same are recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws, and the decisions of courts, the possessors and owners of such vested rights shall be maintained and protected in the same...
Page 413 - Journal, nor unless the party complained of has been served with a copy of the complaint against him, and shall have had an opportunity of being heard in his defense.
Page 407 - SECTION 1. The judicial power of the State shall be vested in the Senate sitting as a Court of Impeachment, in a Supreme Court, Superior Courts, Justices of the Peace, and such inferior courts as the Legislature may establish in any incorporated city, or town, or city and county.
Page 177 - ... upon such terms as may be just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, order, or other proceeding, taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect...
Page 413 - The Legislature may also provide for the appointment, by the several Superior Courts, of one or more Commissioners in their respective counties, or cities and counties, with authority to perform chamber business of the Judges of the Superior Courts, to take depositions, and perform such other business connected with the administration of justice as may be prescribed by law.
Page 309 - ... that the property or fund is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured.
Page 412 - Superior Court may be tried by a Judge pro tempore, who must be a member of the bar, agreed upon in writing by the parties litigant, or their attorneys of record, approved by the Court, and sworn to try the cause SBC.
Page 245 - And you are hereby notified that, unless you so appear and answer, the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the complaint...