The Argumentation of Thomas Erskine in the Trial of Thomas Hardy: A Case Study in Arguementation |
Contents
THE NEED FOR PARLIAMENTARY REFORM | 4 |
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE PARLIAMENTARY REFORMERS | 15 |
THE EFFECT OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION ON | 29 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
25th of Edward advocate appeal attempt Attorney-General audience believed bill boroughs Britain British Brougham Burke's Chapter concerning Constitutional Information corruption court crime Crown declared deductive argument defense economic reform Edmund Burke elected emotional proofs England English Erskine concluded Erskine declared Erskine's ethical proofs Eyre fact forensic France French Revolution friends G. P. Putnam's Sons Gibbs Goodrich Hansard Hardy's high treason House of Commons Ibid idea interpretation John jury King King's letter liberty London Corresponding Society Marcham Margarot Maurice Margarot method Mitford nation overt acts pamphlet Parliamentary reform petition Pitt political present prisoners proposed convention prosecution public opinion radical reform of Parliament reform societies refuted representation representatives Scott seditious seemed Society for Constitutional speech statute sympathy Thomas Erskine Thomas Hardy Thomas Jones Howell traitorous intent trial of Thomas Veitch vote Wilkes witnesses Wraxall writings Wyvill York