Perjury (contradictory Statements Under Oath): Hearing Before a Subcommittee on the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-first Congress, Second Session on S. 933, to Extend the Law Relating to Perjury to the Willful Giving of Contradictory Statements Under Oath. March 10, 1950Considers (81) S. 933. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 7
Page 2
... grand jury which indicted certain policemen for conspiracy , and at their trial repudiated her testimony . She was then in- dicted for perjury . At her trial she took the stand and admitted that her testimony before the grand jury was ...
... grand jury which indicted certain policemen for conspiracy , and at their trial repudiated her testimony . She was then in- dicted for perjury . At her trial she took the stand and admitted that her testimony before the grand jury was ...
Page 4
... grand jury proceedings , and when he comes to trial of the case , he repudiates that statement and testifies just to the opposite . That is primarily what the Department had in mind . It did not think it advisable to include every ...
... grand jury proceedings , and when he comes to trial of the case , he repudiates that statement and testifies just to the opposite . That is primarily what the Department had in mind . It did not think it advisable to include every ...
Page 5
... grand jury , and he does not appear there , and they indict him , and he is put to the expense of defending himself from the indictment when he was thoroughly honest about it and in good faith , and his evidence was based upon a then ...
... grand jury , and he does not appear there , and they indict him , and he is put to the expense of defending himself from the indictment when he was thoroughly honest about it and in good faith , and his evidence was based upon a then ...
Page 6
... grand jury and makes one statement , and later on the case is called for trial and he repudiates that statement , makes a contrary statement . I do not know which one is true and which one is false . Maybe it is as plausible and well ...
... grand jury and makes one statement , and later on the case is called for trial and he repudiates that statement , makes a contrary statement . I do not know which one is true and which one is false . Maybe it is as plausible and well ...
Page 7
... grand - jury hearing , the trial , it seems to me that it might well be argued that that would be a part of the judicial proceed- ing . Mr. GREEN . So as to come under the purview of this statute ? Mr. DAGGER . Yes , to come under the ...
... grand - jury hearing , the trial , it seems to me that it might well be argued that that would be a part of the judicial proceed- ing . Mr. GREEN . So as to come under the purview of this statute ? Mr. DAGGER . Yes , to come under the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1st sess admin affidavit attorney authorizes an oath Bar Association believe Blackstone certify truly chairman committee competent tribunal Congress contradictory testimony convicted DAGGER declaration defendant Department of Justice depose falsity Federal perjury statute Federal statute fully and contrary GARRETT L grand jury grand-jury hearing GREEN guilty of perjury HOMER FERGUSON indicted innocent judicial proceeding June 25 lapse material matter ment Miss MOYNAHAN otherwise expressly provided PERJURY CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS person proceedings in respect proof proposed amendment prosecution for perjury prosecutor provided by law purview quantitative rule second statement Senate bill 933 Senator WITHERS single perjurious statement STATEMENT OF GOLDEN statements are involved statements in judicial statements under oath statute of limitations SUBCOMMITTEE subscribes any material taken an oath testify testimony or statements thing title 18 trial true two-witness rule United States authorizes United States Code UNITED STATES SENATE Weiler Wigmore willfully gives witness and corroborating written testimony
Popular passages
Page 2 - Whoever— (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true...
Page 1 - ... an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true, is guilty of perjury, and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Page 1 - Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That title 18, United States Code, section 241, is amended to read as follows : "SEC.
Page 1 - Code, chapter 79. to add a new section, 1623, to extend the law relating to perjury to the willful giving of contradictory statements under oath; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Page 2 - The amendment consists of the italicized interpolated addition of the phiase "or willfully gives or makes contradictory testimony or statements in judicial proceedings in respect to any material matter...
Page 1 - ... contradictory testimony or statements in judicial proceedings in respect to any material matter, is guilty of perjury, and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Page 1 - Washington, DC The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:30 am, in room 424, Senate Office Building, Hon.