Page images
PDF
EPUB

same force and effect as if such person had taken an oath in the usual form.

XXI. Persons making a false affirmation to be subject to the same punishment as for perjury.]-If any person making such solemn affirmation or declaration shall wilfully, falsely and corruptly affirm or declare any matter or thing, which, if the same had been sworn in the usual form, would have amounted to wilful and corrupt perjury, every such person so offending shall incur the same penalties as by the laws and statutes of this kingdom are or may be enacted or provided against persons convicted of wilful and corrupt perjury.

XXII. How far a party may discredit his own witness.]— A party producing a witness shall not be allowed to impeach his credit by general evidence of bad character, but he may, in case the witness shall in the opinion of the judge prove adverse, contradict him by other evidence, or, by leave of the judge, prove that he has made at other times a statement inconsistent with his present testimony; but before such last-mentioned proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement.

XXIII. Proof of contradictory statements of adverse witness.]-If a witness upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the subject-matter of the cause, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit that he has made such statement, proof may be given that he did in fact make it; but before such proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement.

XXIV. Cross-examination as to previous statements in writing.]-A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing, or reduced into writing, relative to the subject-matter of the cause without such writing being shown to him; but if it is intended to contradict such witness by the writing, his attention must,

before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him: provided always, that it shall be competent for the judge, at any time during the trial, to require the production of the writing for his inspection, and he may thereupon make such use of it for the purposes of the trial as he shall think fit.

XXV. Proof of previous conviction of a witness may be given.]-A witness in any cause may be questioned as to whether he has been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor, and, upon being so questioned, if he either denies the fact, or refuses to answer, it shall be lawful for the opposite party to prove such conviction; and a certificate containing the substance and effect only (omitting the formal part) of the indictment and conviction for such offence, purporting to be signed by the clerk of the court, or other officer having the custody of the records of the court where the offender was convicted, or by the deputy of such clerk or officer (for which certificate a fee of five shillings and no more shall be demanded or taken), shall, upon proof of the identity of the person, be sufficient evidence of the said conviction, without proof of the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed the same.

XXVI. Attesting witness need not be called, except in certain cases.]-It shall not be necessary to prove by the attesting witness any instrument to the validity of which attestation is not requisite ; and such instrument may be proved by admission or otherwise, as if there had been no attesting witness thereto.

XXVII. Comparison of disputed writing.]-Comparison of a disputed writing with any writing proved to the satisfaction of the judge to be genuine shall be permitted to be made by witnesses; and such writings, and the evidence of witnesses respecting the same, may be submitted to the court and jury as evidence of the genuineness, or otherwise, of the writing in dispute.

IMPROVEMENT

OF THE

JURISDICTION

OF EQUITY ACT, AND ORDER OF THE 5TH FEBRUARY, 1861.

15 & 16 VICT. c. 86, ss. 29-40.

An Act to amend the Practice and Course of Proceeding in the High Court of Chancery. [1 July, 1852.]

XXIX. Plaintiff, when suits by bill are at issue, may give notice to defendant to adduce evidence orally or by affidavit.]-Superseded by the order of the 5th of February,

1861.

XXX. Evidence may be taken orally if required, but the court may in certain cases make an order, &c.]—Ibid.

XXXI. Witnesses to be examined by one of the examiners of the court in the presence of the parties.]-All witnesses to be examined orally under the provisions of this act shall be so examined by or before one of the examiners of the court, or by or before an examiner to be specially appointed by the court, the examiner being furnished by the plaintiff with a copy of the bill, and of the answer, if any, in the cause; and such examination shall take place in the presence of the parties, their counsel, solicitors, or agents, and the witnesses so examined orally shall be subject to crossexamination and re-examination; and such examination, cross-examination and re-examination shall be conducted as nearly as may be in the mode now in use in courts of common law with respect to a witness about to go abroad, and not expected to be present at the trial of a cause.

XXXII. Depositions to be taken down in writing and read over to the witness, who shall sign the same in presence of the parties, but if he refuse to sign, examiner may, and state any special matter he may think fit.]-The depositions taken upon any such oral examination as aforesaid shall be taken down in writing by the examiner, not ordinarily by question and answer, but in the form of a narrative, and when completed shall be read over to the witness, and

signed by him in the presence of the parties, or such of them as may think fit to attend: provided always, that in case the witness shall refuse to sign the said depositions, then the examiner shall sign the same, and such examiner may, upon all examinations, state any special matter to the court as he shall think fit; provided also, that it shall be in the discretion of the examiner to put down any particular question or answer, if there should appear any special reason for doing so; and any question or questions which may be objected to shall be noticed or referred to by the examiner in or upon the depositions, and he shall state his opinion thereon to the counsel, solicitors, or parties, and shall refer to such statement on the face of the depositions, but he shall not have power to decide upon the materiality or relevancy of any question or questions; and the court shall have power to deal with the costs of immaterial or irrelevant depositions as may be just.

XXXIII. If parties refuse to be sworn or to answer any lawful questions, the same course to be pursued as is now adopted-Proviso as to witness demurring to questions.]—If any person produced before any such examiner as a witness shall refuse to be sworn, or to answer any lawful question put to him by the examiner, or by either of the parties, or by his or their counsel, solicitor, or agent, the same course shall be adopted with respect to such witness as is now pursued in the case of a witness produced for examination before an examiner of the said court, upon written interrogatories, and refusing to be sworn, or to answer some lawful question: provided always, that if any witness shall demur or object to any question or questions which may be put to him, the question or questions so put, and the demurrer or objection of the witness thereto, shall be taken down by the examiner, and transmitted by him to the Record Office of the said court, to be there filed; and the validity of such demurrer or objection shall be decided by the court; and the costs of and occasioned by such demurrer or objection shall be in the discretion of the court.

XXXIV. Original depositions to be transmitted to the Record Office, and filed.]-When the examination of witnesses before any examiner shall have been concluded, the original depositions, authenticated by the signature of such examiner, shall be transmitted by him to the Record Office

of the said court, to be there filed, and any party to the suit may have a copy thereof, or of any part or portion thereof, upon payment for the same in such manner as shall be provided by any general order of the Lord Chancellor in that behalf.

XXXV. Commission for examination of witnesses dispensed with, and examiner empowered to adminster oaths.]— It shall not be necessary to sue out any commission for the examination of any witnesses within the jurisdiction of the said court; and any examiner appointed by any order of the court shall have the like power of administering oaths as commissioners now have under commissions issued by the court for the examination of witnesses.

XXXVI. Affidavits as to particular facts, &c., may be used.]-Notwithstanding that the plaintiff or the defendant in any suit in the said court may have elected that the evidence in the cause should be taken orally, affidavits by particular witnesses, or affidavits as to particular facts or circumstances, may, by consent, or by leave of the court obtained upon notice, be used on the hearing of any cause, and such consent, with the approbation of the court, may be given by or on the part of married women or infants or other persons under disability.

XXXVII. Affidavits to be divided into paragraphs numbered.]-Every affidavit to be used in the said court shall be divided into paragraphs, and every paragraph shall be numbered consecutively, and, as nearly as may be, shall be confined to a distinct portion of the subject.

XXXVIII. Evidence oral or by affidavit, on both sides to be closed within time prescribed by general order-Witnesses by affidavit to be subject to oral cross-examination, and afterwards to re-examination-Witnesses bound to attend-As to expenses attending cross-examinations, &c.]-The evidence on both sides in any suit in the said court, whether taken orally or upon affidavit, shall be closed within such time or respective times after issue joined as shall in that behalf be prescribed by any general order of the Lord Chancellor, but with power to the court to enlarge the same as it may see fit; and after the time fixed for closing the evidence no further evidence, whether oral or by affidavit, shall be

« PreviousContinue »