Allums, et al. v. Hawley, Anderson v. Snow & Co. et al. Auld and Wilson, Avery and Martin, .733 Broadnax v. Sims' Ex'r,..... .......742 ..444 Buchanan & wife and Duffee, Ad'r, 27 ..431 Buford and Wier, .812 .430 Avery & Speed, &c. and Lockhard, 502 .909 .79 ..134 .685 .313 .253 .903 .757 .238 .606 .900 .655 622 .725 .625 Burden, Adm'r, and Treadwell,......660 Chandler & Moore v. Lyon, et al.....35 Chaney, ex parte,.... Bagby, Gov. v. Chandler, et al.......230 Baker, Johnson & Co. and Hobson, 357 Ball v. Bank of the State of Ala.....590 Bank Br. at Mobile and Blackman, 103 Bank, Br. Mobile and Crawford,.. Bank, Br. at Mobile v. Murphy,. .119 Bank, Br. at Mobile and Beard,. .344 Bank, Br.Mob. and Hooks & Wright,580 Bank, Br. Mobile and Hollinger & Bank, Br. at Mobile v. Hunt, et al. 876 Bank of Mob. v. Sayre & Ledyard, 866 Bank of Mobile v. P. & M. Bank,...772 Bank of the State of Ala. and Ball,.590 Bank, P. & M. and Bank of Mobile, 772 Barnett v. Gaines & Townsend,. .373 Bayles, et al. and Bradford,.. Beard v. The Br. Bank at Mobile,...344 Blackman v. Br. Bank at Mobile,...103 Bolton & Stracener and Wright,....548 Bond, heirs of, and Smith, ad'mr,....386 .353 .570 ..731 .527 .312 Chilton, et al. and Hendricks & wife,691 Clapp, et al. v. Mock, et al.... Clegge and Woodward, et al... .203 Clute & Mead and Hobson,.... Coats, use, &c. and Windham, et al. 285 .811 Stout, Ingoldsby & Co. and Peake...647 White and Seaman et al..... .656 .820 Williams et al. and Lattimore... .574 Williams, sheriff, et al. and Johnson, 529 Teague & Teague v. O'Neil et al....345 .713 Thomas and Bell & Casey............527 Thompson and McBride and wife, 650 ..536 REPORTS OF CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED, JANUARY TERM, 1845. ALEXANDER GRAHAM v. JOHN LOCKHART. 1. A deed of trust operative as a security for the payment of money, is not fraudulent per se, on account of the reservation of uses to the grantor. 2. Quere? Whether a deed conveying property for the benefit of sureties, and fixing the law day of the deed to a time subsequent to the maturity of the debts, for which the sureties are bound, is operative as a conveyance, without the assent of the sureties. 3. So far as the particular creditor is concerned, the debtor, with his assent may stipulate that the effects conveyed may be continued, in trade or planting, for a definite or indefinite period, but such a stipulation cannot prevent any other creditor from his right to sell the resulting trust of the debtor, in satisfaction of his execution. 4. Quere? Whether a debtor, by the mortgage of his perishable personal es- 5. The powers of a Court of Equity are sufficient to prevent injury to the 7. In claims interposed under the statute, to property which is levied on as |