Arkansas Reports: Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas, at the ..., Volume 75Woodruff Print. Company, 1906 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... reason why a judgment by default against the tenant in an action of ejectment to which the landlord was not a party should preclude him from setting up his title to the land . We believe the correct rule to be that a judgment against ...
... reason why a judgment by default against the tenant in an action of ejectment to which the landlord was not a party should preclude him from setting up his title to the land . We believe the correct rule to be that a judgment against ...
Page 6
... reason to support it , and would be very unjust to holders of real property . On the whole case , we are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed , and it is so ordered . I. 2 . 4 . LANDON V. MORRIS . Opinion delivered April ...
... reason to support it , and would be very unjust to holders of real property . On the whole case , we are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed , and it is so ordered . I. 2 . 4 . LANDON V. MORRIS . Opinion delivered April ...
Page 11
... reason for doing so ; yet their testimony is to some extent of a negative character ; as it is possible that , in a crowded place where a large number of tracts of land are rapidly sold , which is usually the case at tax sales , their ...
... reason for doing so ; yet their testimony is to some extent of a negative character ; as it is possible that , in a crowded place where a large number of tracts of land are rapidly sold , which is usually the case at tax sales , their ...
Page 16
... reach tending to show the nature and existence of that which it is asked to establish . There is no reason why the same rule should not apply when , instead of being lost , the record was never made up , 16 [ 75 WARD V. MAgness .
... reach tending to show the nature and existence of that which it is asked to establish . There is no reason why the same rule should not apply when , instead of being lost , the record was never made up , 16 [ 75 WARD V. MAgness .
Page 24
... reason why it should not be made in the divorce case when all the parties are before it , instead of remit- ting the parties to the other remedy . Nelson on Marriage and Divorce , § 979. This reasoning commends itself to the court ...
... reason why it should not be made in the divorce case when all the parties are before it , instead of remit- ting the parties to the other remedy . Nelson on Marriage and Divorce , § 979. This reasoning commends itself to the court ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adverse possession affirmed agent agreement alleged amount appellant appellant's appellee Arkansas assault attorney cause chancellor Chancery Court Circuit Court claim complaint conductor contract contributory negligence conveyance conveyed counsel court erred court of equity creditors damages Davis debt deceased decree deed defendant denied Desha County entitled equity evidence executed facts failed filed fraud homestead Howard County Bank injury instructed the jury issue J. J. Johnson Judge judgment Kirby's Digest land lien Little Rock Louis Louis Southwestern Railway lumber ment mortgage Murray negligence Northwest Railroad Opinion delivered April paid parties passenger payment petition Pine Bluff plaintiff possession proof purchase question railroad company Railway Company reason receiver recover remanded rents reversed rule sold statement statute suit sustained testified testimony Texarkana thereof tion tract train trial trust verdict void witness
Popular passages
Page 199 - In the event of disagreement as to the amount of loss. the same shall, as above provided, be ascertained by two competent and disinterested appraisers, the insured and this company each selecting one, and the two so chosen shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire; the appraisers together shall then estimate and appraise the loss, stating separately sound value and damage, and, failing to agree, shall submit their differences to the umpire; and the award in writing of any two *shall...
Page 123 - No local or special law shall be passed unless notice of the intention to apply therefor shall have been published in the locality where the matter or thing to be affected may be situated, which notice shall state the...
Page 259 - ... neglect of the insured to use all reasonable means to save and preserve the property at and after a fire, or when the property is endangered by fire in neighboring premises...
Page 124 - The moment a court ventures to substitute its own judgment for that of the Legislature, in any case where the Constitution has vested the Legislature with power over the subject, that moment it enters upon a field where it is impossible to set limits to its authority, and where its discretion alone will measure the extent of its interference.
Page 108 - ... shall jointly and severally be liable to an action founded on this statute, for all debts of such corporation contracted during the period of any such neglect or refusal.
Page 277 - Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined in any sum not less than twenty-five dollars, and each and every violation shall be construed as a separate offense.
Page 225 - There was evidence to justify the court in submitting to the jury the question as to whether or not the...
Page 542 - The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.
Page 511 - The supreme court, except in cases otherwise directed by this constitution, shall have appellate jurisdiction only, which shall be co-extensive with the State, under such restrictions and regulations, not repugnant to this constitution, as may, from time to time, be prescribed by law...
Page 258 - The court instructs the jury that if they find from the evidence that said contract of insurance contained a provision that said defendant company should not be liable for loss caused directly or indirectly...