When Atheism Becomes Religion: America's New FundamentalistsFrom the New York Times bestselling author of American Fascists and the NBCC finalist for War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning comes this timely and compelling work about new atheists: those who attack religion to advance the worst of global capitalism, intolerance and imperial projects. Chris Hedges, who graduated from seminary at Harvard Divinity School, has long been a courageous voice in a world where there are too few. He observes that there are two radical, polarized and dangerous sides to the debate on faith and religion in America: the fundamentalists who see religious faith as their prerogative, and the new atheists who brand all religious belief as irrational and dangerous. Both sides use faith to promote a radical agenda, while the religious majority, those with a commitment to tolerance and compassion as well as to their faith, are caught in the middle. The new atheists, led by Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris, do not make moral arguments about religion. Rather, they have created a new form of fundamentalism that attempts to permeate society with ideas about our own moral superiority and the omnipotence of human reason. I Don't Believe in Atheists critiques the radical mindset that rages against religion and faith. Hedges identifies the pillars of the new atheist belief system, revealing that the stringent rules and rigid traditions in place are as strict as those of any religious practice. Hedges claims that those who have placed blind faith in the morally neutral disciplines of reason and science create idols in their own image -- a sin for either side of the spectrum. He makes an impassioned, intelligent case against religious and secular fundamentalism, which seeks to divide the world into those worthy of moral and intellectual consideration and those who should be condemned, silenced and eradicated. Hedges shatters the new atheists' assault against religion in America, and in doing so, makes way for new, moderate voices to join the debate. This is a book that must be read to understand the state of the battle about faith. |
Contents
| 1 | |
| 9 | |
Science and Religion | 45 |
The New Fundamentalism | 69 |
SelfDelusion | 91 |
The Myth of Moral Progress | 113 |
Humiliation and Revenge | 131 |
The Illusive Self | 159 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
absurd acts American argued atheists attacks become behavior belief systems Bible biology bomb capacity Christian fundamentalists Christian Right civilization collective humiliation collective moral progress create cult of science culture Darwin Dawkins death delusion dreams empowered End of Faith Enlightenment eradicate ethical evil existence feared forces Freud Fyodor Dostoevsky genocide God Delusion Harris Hitchens human history human nature human perfectibility human race human society human species humankind Ibid ignorance industrial intellectual Iraq irrational Islamic Joseph Conrad justify Karen Armstrong killing Lifton live lusts Marcel Proust meaning memes ment Middle East million moral advancement murder myth nation Nazi Nietzsche one’s ourselves philosophers political possible reality reason and science Reinhold Niebuhr religion religious fundamentalists Sam Harris science and reason scientific Search of Lost secular seek Serbs sion slaughter social suicide suicide bombing television terror terrorists things tion Tom Ford torture totalitarian truth universal utopian utopian visions violence virtue writes wrote York
Popular passages
Page 158 - Merciful Heaven, Thou rather with thy sharp and sulphurous bolt Split'st the unwedgeable and gnarled oak Than the soft myrtle: but man, proud man, Drest in a little brief authority, Most ignorant of what he's most assured, His glassy essence, like an angry ape, Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven As make the angels weep; who, with our spleens, Would all themselves laugh mortal.
Page 115 - The element of truth behind all this, which people are so ready to disavow, is that men are not gentle creatures who want to be loved, and who at the most can defend themselves if they are attacked; they are, on the contrary, creatures among whose instinctual endowments is to be reckoned a powerful share of aggressiveness.
Page 52 - The following proposition seems to me in a high degree probable — namely, that any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being here included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well, or nearly as well developed, as in man.
Page 168 - But when from a long-distant past nothing subsists, after the people are dead, after the things are broken and scattered, still, alone, more fragile, but with more vitality, more unsubstantial, more persistent, more faithful, the smell and taste of things remain poised a long time, like souls, ready to remind us...
Page 147 - He began with the argument that we whites, from the point of development we had arrived at, 'must necessarily appear to them [savages] in the nature of supernatural beings we approach them with the might as of a deity, 1 and so on, and so on. 'By the simple exercise of our will we can exert a power for good practically unbounded,
Page 46 - I asserted, and I repeat, that a man has no reason to be ashamed of having an ape for his grandfather. If there were an ancestor whom I should feel shame in recalling, it would be a man, a man of restless and versatile intellect, who, not content with an equivocal success in his own sphere of activity, plunges into scientific questions with which he has no real acquaintance...
Page 36 - Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak and that it is doing God's service when it is violating all His laws.
Page 96 - All I know is what the words know, and the dead things, and that makes a handsome little sum, with a beginning, a middle and an end as in the well-built phrase and the long sonata of the dead.
Page 62 - I remember discussions with Bohr which went through many hours till very late at night and ended almost in despair; and when at the end of the discussion I went alone for a walk in the neighboring park I repeated to myself again and again the question: Can nature possibly be as absurd as it seemed to us in these atomic experiments?