Page images
PDF
EPUB

A WEEKLY JOURNAL

CONTAININO

All the Decisions of the Supreme Court of California.

[ocr errors]

IMPORTANT DECISIONS OF OREGON AND NEVADA, AND OF THE
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS OF CALI.
FORNIA; ALSO OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
AND COURTS OF LAST RESORT IN OTHER STATIS;
ALSO IMPORTANT LAND DECISIONS OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.

[ocr errors]

klContalien* ALL that, teetons of the appreme Court of talllornia.

VOLUME I.

(Continuation from "San Francisco Law Journal," Vol. 1. - Whole Series, Vol. 2.)

FROM MARCH TO OCTOBER, 1878

SAN FRANCISCO:
F. A. SCOFIELD & CO., Públishers,
603 Washington Street.

1878.

AUG 30 1943

Supreme Court of California.

W. T. WALLACE, Chief Justice.

Associate Justices :
J. B. CROCKETT,

A. C. NILES,
E. W. McKINSTRY,

A. L. RHODES.
Gideon J. Carpenter........................Reporter
Jo Hamilton.......................Attorney-General.
D. B. 'Wooll...

...............................Clerk. John P. Poole.

.... Deputy Clerk, Sacramento. H. P. Bush.

Deputy Clerk, San Francisco.. F. D. Mott....

... Deputy Clerk, Los Angeles. Chas. A. Sumner ............. Phonographic Reporter. Thos. F. O'Connor........... Secretary and Librarian, Henry Finkler................................Bailift.

COORT MEETS -..." · At San Francisco --Second Monday in January : And July, at 240 Clay Strces corner of Kearney. :

At Sacramento-Second Monday in May and No. vember, in the State House.

At Los Angeles-Second Monday in April and October, in the Hellman-Mascarel Block.

...

[ocr errors]

.

.

.

.

316

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

• kupet..

..

.

...

..

Smith, ex parte...................... 888 Hendley v. Puteh ...

Smith v. Lawrencericire ...cono 100 Hook v. Honderuoti 1000 euro 206

Snow , Kimir..ioncm...........

Hudson' v. Irwin... Home

899

Stanway v. Rublo ... .cccccccccnn's

Jackson. v. Stone... ..

Stockton, City of, v. Clark............

Judson v. Seligman. ....
Stookton, City of, v. Skinner........

Kuonan, Eutate of.. .....
Stockton & Linden Q. R. Co. y. Stook

Korns v. Dean .. 1o. invoinni
ton & Copperópolis R. R. Co........

Kolman v. Hennessey.... .. ....

Taloott v. B'd State Harbor Comm'rg..

Lynoh v. Los Angeles County Bank.... 899

Temple v. Alexander ....on

Teschmaker V. Austin .........

408 Miller v. Henderson

Thompson v. Corpetelu ..............

31 Moulton v. Parks ...

Moleran v. Benton. 1010, lis 0.

Unger v, Roper .......................

Paolo Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Brady..

Vilhac r. Stookton and tone R. R. Co..

Parker V. Altschul. ..... ....

Wanger v. Boinord .......onnoscono....

People v. Butts .... inn.

Watsou V. Cornell.......

People v. Carriuk... .. 1..

Weili v. Jone.....ooo...on.cnn.cnnn.

Peuple v. Fong Ah Tuck.. ...

Wetalar v. Fituh.......

| People V. Herrora .... . oon

Wentworth v. Miller & Lux.

People v. Hooper & Hooper, ....

White, Estate of ......

People v. Jonos ... .

Wilkinson v. Merrill.

People v. Southern Pacific Railroud....

Wills v. Austin ...

Plumuner vi Alexander .... .... ...

Powers v. Leith....
Ybarra v. Lorenjana
adana.. . . ....

Prentice v. Odd Fellows Savings and

Commercial Bank........... io..

Raisch v. City and County of San Fran.

Unwritten Decisions. Read v. Mahoney ........

Reynolds v. Groneville....

398

Ambrose v. Roper.. ...

888 Rogers v. Watson.. ....

Austin v. Austiu........ .... ....

Rosenfeld v. Reay.. ...!

Rothenbush v. Rothenbush

Baker v. Avise.....

Bank of San Luis Obispo y Johnson... Rondulush v. Gladding ...

298 Rouguet v. Austin... .....

Bascum v. Davis ....... ....

Beaudry v. Los Angeles... ...,

116 Sanchez v. Temple, .....

Botsford v. Howell. l.. ....

160 | San Francisco v. City Gas Company....

Bourk v. Reid ..... ......... ....

423 Sampoon v. Stickney & Coombo......

Brooks v. Carpentier......

387 | Seal v. Board Supervisors of San Fran..

Burkhart v. Meyerstein... ..

| Silver v. Mullan ... .... ....

Burns v. Miller .... .... vone

178 Snyder v. Johnson ... ... ... ....

Burton v. Robinson....... ....

70 St. John v. Meyerstein & Co .... ....

Stockton, City of, v. Holden .... ....

Cassner v. Goldtree. ...

Stockton, City of, v. Nat'l G. Bank of

Clark v. Teoopah Silver Mining Co

D. O. Mills & Co. Hon seri ....

Clay v. Marriott ... .... .

Strothor v. Diefendorff. ... ... ....

Coburn v. Ames....:.

Sullivan, Estate of ...

Commercial Bank v. Baliwin.....

Comper v. Rowe.... .... ....

420 Swamp Land District No. 150 v. Feran.

Dempsey v. Baxter. ....

176

Toblemann v. Reay

Dyer v. Brandenstein..... .... 113 Unger v. Roper (see Opinion, 247)....

Dyer v. Treadwell.. .. . ... .... 432 Union Savings Bank v. Nolan ....

Ellis v. Kneeland. .. .... .... ....

431 Wallace v. Miller

Weeks, Estate of...

Farmers' Storage and Commission Co. v.

.... ..

Wiggins v. McFarlane. ... ....

De Lappe.. .......... .!!

Feybl. Christina, Estate of..

1 Wilson v. Southern Pacific R. R. 230

Wilson v. Player ..

Fatt v. Rohrle.......... .... ...

Winters v. Browner ....

261

Friedman v. Nelson.si

Wood v. Jackson .. .

Gharky v. Werner.. ....

.... ... 383, 399 Wooster v. Paige... ......... ..

Glidden v. Robinson

78

Gottschalk v. Kester ....

13 | Young v. City of San Francisco. .... 383

Harris v. Walker...

77 Zeile v. Hood .... ....

Head v. Bell ....

233 | Zeinwaldt v. Sacramento City R. R. Co. 53

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

054

255

208
188

« PreviousContinue »