The Federal Power Over Carriers and Corporations |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 9
Page 8
... Harvard Law Review , 341. On the general subject see " The Elasticity of the Constitution , " by Mr. Arthur W. Machen , Jr. , 14 Harvard Law Re- view , 200 . 1 possession of a boundless field of power , no 8 THE FEDERAL POWER OVER.
... Harvard Law Review , 341. On the general subject see " The Elasticity of the Constitution , " by Mr. Arthur W. Machen , Jr. , 14 Harvard Law Re- view , 200 . 1 possession of a boundless field of power , no 8 THE FEDERAL POWER OVER.
Page 26
... law centre about the growth of individual lib- erty . To give to the provisions in the American Con- stitution which ... Harvard Law Review , 365 . " McKechnie , " Magna Carta , " 445 . 3 Parker , C. J. , in Mitchel v . Reynolds , 1 P ...
... law centre about the growth of individual lib- erty . To give to the provisions in the American Con- stitution which ... Harvard Law Review , 365 . " McKechnie , " Magna Carta , " 445 . 3 Parker , C. J. , in Mitchel v . Reynolds , 1 P ...
Page 76
... Harvard Law Review , 159 . 25 How . 604 . words of the opinion be literally accepted in their modern 76 THE FEDERAL POWER OVER.
... Harvard Law Review , 159 . 25 How . 604 . words of the opinion be literally accepted in their modern 76 THE FEDERAL POWER OVER.
Page 83
... law , but is a right which every citizen is entitled to exercise under the Constitution , while the duty , and ... Harvard Law Review , 539 , 544. See also decision of Judge Peter S. Grosscup , in United States v . Swift & Co. ( 1903 ) ...
... law , but is a right which every citizen is entitled to exercise under the Constitution , while the duty , and ... Harvard Law Review , 539 , 544. See also decision of Judge Peter S. Grosscup , in United States v . Swift & Co. ( 1903 ) ...
Page 137
... Review , October , 1905 . 2 " The Power of Congress to Regulate Railway Rates , " 18 Harvard Law Review , 572 . 3 Federalist , No. II . * Tucker , Constitution , Sec . 256 . CHAPTER VI FEDERAL INCORPORATION THE differences of opinion ...
... Review , October , 1905 . 2 " The Power of Congress to Regulate Railway Rates , " 18 Harvard Law Review , 572 . 3 Federalist , No. II . * Tucker , Constitution , Sec . 256 . CHAPTER VI FEDERAL INCORPORATION THE differences of opinion ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1st Sess 2d Sess Act of April Act of Feb Act of March American Annals 18th Cong applied April 11 Articles of Confederation authority bill carrier Chief Justice citizens coasting trade combination commerce clause competition Constitution construction contracts corporations Daniel Sheffey decision doctrine duty E. C. Knight Co Edmund Randolph Elliot Deb establish exclusive exercise exports extent Federal control Federal government Federal jurisdiction Federal power Federalist forbid foreign commerce foreign nations Gibbons granted Harvard Law Review Ibid imports imposed intercourse interstate commerce interstate transportation legislation liberty license limited ment merce monopoly nature navigation navigation act Northern Securities Co Ogden opinion person port power of Congress power over commerce power to regulate prohibition provision purpose question Railroad regulate commerce relation restrictions rule Senator South Carolina Speech Supreme Court taxation tion U. S. Stat United words York
Popular passages
Page 30 - Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has any right to but himself. The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his.
Page 13 - States : regulating the trade and managing all affairs with the Indians not members of any of the states ; provided that the legislative right of any state within its own limits be not infringed or violated...
Page 13 - The United States in congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority, or by that of the respective states..
Page 211 - Not only, therefore, can there be no loss of separate and independent autonomy to the States, through their union under the Constitution, but it may be not unreasonably said that the preservation of the States, and the maintenance of their governments, are as much within the design and care of the Constitution as the preservation of the Union and the maintenance of the National government. The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible...
Page 197 - Doubtless the power to control the manufacture of a given thing involves in a certain sense the control of its disposition, but this is a secondary and not the primary sense; and although the exercise of that power may result in bringing the operation of commerce into play, it does not control it, and affects it only incidentally and indirectly. Commerce succeeds to manufacture, and is not a part of it.
Page 177 - Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any such contract or engage in any such combination or conspiracy, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor...
Page 25 - That no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation...
Page 36 - It must be conceded that there are such rights in every free government beyond the control of the State. A government which recognized no such rights, which held the lives, the liberty, and the property of its citizens subject at all times to the absolute disposition and unlimited control of even the most democratic depository of power, is after all but a despotism.
Page 210 - Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
Page 105 - The repugnancy of the law of Delaware to the constitution is placed entirely on its repugnancy to the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states ; a power which has not been so exercised as to affect the question.