The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 89
Page 120
Both writ of error and appeal dismissed. Lyman H. Hays, of Willcox, and J. T. Kingsbury, of Tombstone, for plaintiff in error. Frank W. Goodbody, of Tombstone, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Action on note given for purchase price ...
Both writ of error and appeal dismissed. Lyman H. Hays, of Willcox, and J. T. Kingsbury, of Tombstone, for plaintiff in error. Frank W. Goodbody, of Tombstone, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. Action on note given for purchase price ...
Page 130
Historically, the origin and exercise of the writ of quo warranto presents a fascinating study, but the very fascination of It very often occasions some perplexity in the mind of the student "or practitioner. Anciently it was the King's ...
Historically, the origin and exercise of the writ of quo warranto presents a fascinating study, but the very fascination of It very often occasions some perplexity in the mind of the student "or practitioner. Anciently it was the King's ...
Page 620
From a reading of the statute it will be seen that the writ is issued., as a matter of course, by the district court, upon application and the requisite showing. Notice is not required for the purpose of enabling the adverse party to ...
From a reading of the statute it will be seen that the writ is issued., as a matter of course, by the district court, upon application and the requisite showing. Notice is not required for the purpose of enabling the adverse party to ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ