The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 103
All the plaintiffs and one defendant are "complainants" in this proceeding, and judgment in their favor in the sum of $150 for damages sustained by them was given by the court. We have a statute (Comp.
All the plaintiffs and one defendant are "complainants" in this proceeding, and judgment in their favor in the sum of $150 for damages sustained by them was given by the court. We have a statute (Comp.
Page 515
To this effect, one of its witnesses, who was also one of its attorneys, was asked: "Do yon know, Mr. Mansfield, approximately as to what amount or bow much damage the Buffalo Specialty Company has sustained? No, sir; I have not.
To this effect, one of its witnesses, who was also one of its attorneys, was asked: "Do yon know, Mr. Mansfield, approximately as to what amount or bow much damage the Buffalo Specialty Company has sustained? No, sir; I have not.
Page 1012
It is concluded that the $120 item allowed by the Jury was erroneously stricken out and should be restored; the action of the court in striking out the $300 Item for profits is sustained. The cause Is remanded, with directions to modify ...
It is concluded that the $120 item allowed by the Jury was erroneously stricken out and should be restored; the action of the court in striking out the $300 Item for profits is sustained. The cause Is remanded, with directions to modify ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ