The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 16
How can section 3382, supra, apply? There are no petitioners; there are no competing measures or opposing bills; nor does "the Legislature submit any other question." That clause In connection with the other language of the act clearly ...
How can section 3382, supra, apply? There are no petitioners; there are no competing measures or opposing bills; nor does "the Legislature submit any other question." That clause In connection with the other language of the act clearly ...
Page 20
Ferguson (S. D.) supra; In re File No. 31 (Neb.) supra; Prohibitory Amendment Cases (Kan.) supra. The proposed amendment was legally adopted, and Is now a part of the Constitution of this state. Therefore the demurrer of the plaintiffs ...
Ferguson (S. D.) supra; In re File No. 31 (Neb.) supra; Prohibitory Amendment Cases (Kan.) supra. The proposed amendment was legally adopted, and Is now a part of the Constitution of this state. Therefore the demurrer of the plaintiffs ...
Page 284
22, same as section 20, supra, of the Cherokee Agreement, there are no restrictions, and it is not necessary for the heirs to designate a part of said land as a homestead, each having been provided with a homestead by reason of ...
22, same as section 20, supra, of the Cherokee Agreement, there are no restrictions, and it is not necessary for the heirs to designate a part of said land as a homestead, each having been provided with a homestead by reason of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ