The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 3
decision of the question lies with the body or individual to whom the statute has delegated the authority to take." In Barrett et al. v. Kemp et aL, 91 Iowa, 296, 59 N. W. 76, It Is held: "Under acts of General Assembly which empower ...
decision of the question lies with the body or individual to whom the statute has delegated the authority to take." In Barrett et al. v. Kemp et aL, 91 Iowa, 296, 59 N. W. 76, It Is held: "Under acts of General Assembly which empower ...
Page 203
That Is the only question before us. It is not necessary, nor would it be proper for us to decide the moot question as to who, if any one, should respond in damages for the failure of the commissioners to sign the contract and for their ...
That Is the only question before us. It is not necessary, nor would it be proper for us to decide the moot question as to who, if any one, should respond in damages for the failure of the commissioners to sign the contract and for their ...
Page 956
It would be a wild and wide stretch of imagination to say that the form of the question under discussion was the result of ignorance or inadvertence. To the contrary, it is very evident that the question was deliberately framed and ...
It would be a wild and wide stretch of imagination to say that the form of the question under discussion was the result of ignorance or inadvertence. To the contrary, it is very evident that the question was deliberately framed and ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ