The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 3
... question of necessiiy is distinct from the question of public use, and that the former question is exclusively for the Legislature. The necessity, expediency, or propriety of exercising the power of eminent domain to the extent and ...
... question of necessiiy is distinct from the question of public use, and that the former question is exclusively for the Legislature. The necessity, expediency, or propriety of exercising the power of eminent domain to the extent and ...
Page 203
... question before us. It is not necessary, nor would it be proper for us to decide the moot question as to who, if any one, should respond in damages for the failure of the commissioners to sign the contract and for their refusal to ...
... question before us. It is not necessary, nor would it be proper for us to decide the moot question as to who, if any one, should respond in damages for the failure of the commissioners to sign the contract and for their refusal to ...
Page 956
... question in the very teeth of the declaration of the trial court that the question would not be allowed. This was a deliberate defiance of the mandate of the law, which the trial court might well have punished as a contempt of court, or ...
... question in the very teeth of the declaration of the trial court that the question would not be allowed. This was a deliberate defiance of the mandate of the law, which the trial court might well have punished as a contempt of court, or ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ