The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 74
Eminent Domain (§ 202*)— Condemnation Proceedings— Evidence of Value. Held, that it was error for the court to admit evidence showing the value to the appellant of the land to be condemned, since such valuation is not based on the ...
Eminent Domain (§ 202*)— Condemnation Proceedings— Evidence of Value. Held, that it was error for the court to admit evidence showing the value to the appellant of the land to be condemned, since such valuation is not based on the ...
Page 638
Since the petitioners neglected to do this, how can they contend that this proceeding was taken against them through their ... Under these circumstances their failure to keep track of the proceedings and file their exceptions was such a ...
Since the petitioners neglected to do this, how can they contend that this proceeding was taken against them through their ... Under these circumstances their failure to keep track of the proceedings and file their exceptions was such a ...
Page 907
main proceedings made an award in gross, the claim of the lessee is not against the petitioner, but he may ask an apportionment of the award, as authorized by Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 920-931, or sue for money had and received, ...
main proceedings made an award in gross, the claim of the lessee is not against the petitioner, but he may ask an apportionment of the award, as authorized by Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 920-931, or sue for money had and received, ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ