The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 326
This provision of the statute, it will be observed, makes it the duty of common carriers receiving property for Interstate transportation to issue a receipt or bill of lading to the consignor of such property, and makes it liable to any ...
This provision of the statute, it will be observed, makes it the duty of common carriers receiving property for Interstate transportation to issue a receipt or bill of lading to the consignor of such property, and makes it liable to any ...
Page 1017
Findings were made to the effect that the city was not liable, and judgment was rendered dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals. Robert C. Wright, of Portland, for appellant H. M. Tomllnson, of Portland (W. P. La Roche and J. F. ...
Findings were made to the effect that the city was not liable, and judgment was rendered dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals. Robert C. Wright, of Portland, for appellant H. M. Tomllnson, of Portland (W. P. La Roche and J. F. ...
Page 1217
Under the Carmack Amendment of the Interstate Commerce Act, an initial carrier was liable for a connecting carrier's wrongful delivery to the consignee named, who was not tlie holder of the bill of lading. — Coovert v.
Under the Carmack Amendment of the Interstate Commerce Act, an initial carrier was liable for a connecting carrier's wrongful delivery to the consignee named, who was not tlie holder of the bill of lading. — Coovert v.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ