The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 6
fendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Dismissed. Stuart, Cruce & Gilbert, of Oklahoma City, and Martin, Bush & Murray, of Tulsa, for plaintiffs In error. Biddison & Campbell, of Tulsa, and Preston C. West, of Muskogee, for defendant In ...
fendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Dismissed. Stuart, Cruce & Gilbert, of Oklahoma City, and Martin, Bush & Murray, of Tulsa, for plaintiffs In error. Biddison & Campbell, of Tulsa, and Preston C. West, of Muskogee, for defendant In ...
Page 300
... and claimed a recovery against a code- fendant ; and it was held that, while he had the right to intervene and set up his claim in the action, the statute of limitations did not, cease to run until his application was made.
... and claimed a recovery against a code- fendant ; and it was held that, while he had the right to intervene and set up his claim in the action, the statute of limitations did not, cease to run until his application was made.
Page 643
Codes, g 6579, to a defendant to demand relief against a code- fendant does not entitle him to file, without leave of court, an amended answer demanding such relief after the issues between him and plaintiff have been made up.
Codes, g 6579, to a defendant to demand relief against a code- fendant does not entitle him to file, without leave of court, an amended answer demanding such relief after the issues between him and plaintiff have been made up.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141 National reporter system: State series |
| Contributors | California. Supreme Court, Colorado. Supreme Court, Kansas. Supreme Court, Oregon. Supreme Court, Nevada. Supreme Court, Arizona. Supreme Court, Idaho. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, Montana. Supreme Court, Washington (State). Supreme Court, Wyoming. Supreme Court, Utah. Supreme Court, New Mexico. Supreme Court, Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Colorado. Court of Appeals, Oklahoma. Criminal Court of Appeals |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1914 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 7 Aug 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |