The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 63
Page 74
Eminent Domain (§ 202*)— Condemnation Proceedings— Evidence of Value. Held, that it was error for the court to admit evidence showing the value to the appellant of the land to be condemned, since such valuation is not based on the ...
Eminent Domain (§ 202*)— Condemnation Proceedings— Evidence of Value. Held, that it was error for the court to admit evidence showing the value to the appellant of the land to be condemned, since such valuation is not based on the ...
Page 359
power of eminent domain had been conferred on the city, and not on the park board, and the state had never authorized the city to delegate to such board the power to say when, how, or on what conditions the city may exercise the power ...
power of eminent domain had been conferred on the city, and not on the park board, and the state had never authorized the city to delegate to such board the power to say when, how, or on what conditions the city may exercise the power ...
Page 906
Eminent Domain (j 177*)— Proceedings- Parties. All parties who have an interest in the property should, as a general rule, be made par- tics to condemnation proceedings, in the ab- sence of any statutory provisions to the contrary.
Eminent Domain (j 177*)— Proceedings- Parties. All parties who have an interest in the property should, as a general rule, be made par- tics to condemnation proceedings, in the ab- sence of any statutory provisions to the contrary.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ