The Pacific Reporter, Volume 141West Publishing Company, 1914 - Law reports, digests, etc "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 372
It is argued that the quoted instruction did not amount to a statement that Stephenson did in fact waive forfeiture, but that as general agent he had authority to do so; the jury being left to determine whether or not his acts ...
It is argued that the quoted instruction did not amount to a statement that Stephenson did in fact waive forfeiture, but that as general agent he had authority to do so; the jury being left to determine whether or not his acts ...
Page 373
Commenting upon the position taken in some of the authorities that "notice to the agent is notice to the company," he ... Knowledge of the agent is not knowledge of the principal in matters not within the scope of the agent's authority.
Commenting upon the position taken in some of the authorities that "notice to the agent is notice to the company," he ... Knowledge of the agent is not knowledge of the principal in matters not within the scope of the agent's authority.
Page 565
There Is a conflict in the authorities as to whether ejectment will He to secure the possession of streets ... Neither a state board in executing such statute, nor a court in construing it, has any authority to alter or amend it.
There Is a conflict in the authorities as to whether ejectment will He to secure the possession of streets ... Neither a state board in executing such statute, nor a court in construing it, has any authority to alter or amend it.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
80 Wash affirmed agreement alleged amendment Appeal and Error Appeal from Superior appellant appellees assessment authority bonds cause of action Cent certiorari claim Code Colo commissioners complaint concur Constitution contract costs counsel court of equity damages deed defendant demurrer denied District Court eminent domain entitled evidence fact fendant filed held injury issue Judge judgment jury justice Key-No King County land Legislature liable ment mortgage motion Municipal Corporations negligence Note.—For NUMBER In Dec ordinance owner party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Seattle section NUMBER Series & Rep'r statute street sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony Thaddeus Lowe thereof tiff tion topic and section tract trial court trust verdict witness writ