Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah, Volume 4 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
Page 5
... answer certain material and proper questions before the grand jury , and when brought into court again declined to answer , assigning no reason therefor , and was ordered to pay a fine and to stand committed until she should appear and ...
... answer certain material and proper questions before the grand jury , and when brought into court again declined to answer , assigning no reason therefor , and was ordered to pay a fine and to stand committed until she should appear and ...
Page 6
... answer a certain question put to her by the grand jury ; that thereupon the grand jury made a report verified by the affidavit of its foreman , of the fact that such question was put , and of the refusal of the wit- ness to answer it ...
... answer a certain question put to her by the grand jury ; that thereupon the grand jury made a report verified by the affidavit of its foreman , of the fact that such question was put , and of the refusal of the wit- ness to answer it ...
Page 7
... answer the question , and asked her if she could answer the question and if she would go into the grand jury room and answer it , to which she replied : " I will not answer it ; " all of which questions by the court and the answers ...
... answer the question , and asked her if she could answer the question and if she would go into the grand jury room and answer it , to which she replied : " I will not answer it ; " all of which questions by the court and the answers ...
Page 8
... answer a question proposed to her by the grand jury , the case was not further investigated or exam- ined by the grand jury , and therefore it is unfinished , and that he , the foreman , asked the court that the said Belle Harris be ...
... answer a question proposed to her by the grand jury , the case was not further investigated or exam- ined by the grand jury , and therefore it is unfinished , and that he , the foreman , asked the court that the said Belle Harris be ...
Page 9
... answer ; and being without excuse she was in contempt , Ex Parte Adams , 25 Miss . 883 ; and her asser- tion to the court that she would not answer the question was contempt in the face of the court , which the court in furtherance of ...
... answer ; and being without excuse she was in contempt , Ex Parte Adams , 25 Miss . 883 ; and her asser- tion to the court that she would not answer the question was contempt in the face of the court , which the court in furtherance of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action aforesaid answer appellant Arthur Brown authority Belle Harris bonds BOREMAN charge claim coal lands cohabitation common law complaint concurred Congress counsel crime criminal deceased decree defendant demurrer Denver & Rio Denver and Rio district court ditch divorce dollars dying declaration Edmunds act error evidence facts fendant filed grand jury granted guilty held indictment instructions judgment judicial jurisdiction jurors justice legislative legislature Lehi living male person marriage ment mortgage motion Musser necessary objection offense opinion party plaintiff Plaintiff further alleges Pleasant Valley Railway plural marriage polygamy prosecution question reason refusing rehearing respondent Rio Grande Western rule sexual intercourse Spackman statement statute territory of Idaho territory of Utah testimony thereof tion trial United unlawful cohabitation Utah and Pleasant Utah territory Valley Railway Company Venard verdict Western Railway Company wife witness woman women writ ZANE
Popular passages
Page 66 - In case of any other transfer of interest, the action may be continued in the name of the original party, or the court may allow the person to whom the transfer is made to be substituted in the action.
Page 134 - All the forms of pleading in criminal actions, heretofore existing, are abolished; and hereafter, the forms of pleading, and the rules by which the sufficiency of pleadings is to be determined, are those prescribed by this Code.
Page 494 - When there are several charges against any person for the same act or transaction, or for two or more acts or transactions connected together, or for two or more acts or transactions of the same class of crimes or offenses, which may be properly joined, instead of having several indictments the whole may be joined in one indictment in separate counts; and if two or more indictments are found in such cases, the court may order them to be consolidated.
Page 179 - ... and in the meantime may discharge the defendant from custody on his own undertaking of bail for his appearance to answer the charge at the time to which the action is continued.
Page 228 - You are further instructed that you are the sole judges of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given to their testimony.
Page 62 - The distinction between an accessory before the fact and a principal, and between principals in the first and second degree, in cases of felony, is abrogated; and all persons concerned in the commission of a felony, whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, or aid and abet in its commission, though not present, shall hereafter be prosecuted, tried, and punished as principals...
Page 367 - A writ of review may be granted by any Court, except a Police or Justice's Court, when an inferior tribunal, Board, or officer, exercising judicial functions, has exceeded the jurisdiction of such tribunal, Board, or officer, and there is no appeal, nor, in the judgment of the Court, any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.
Page 381 - The supreme court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts and courts of the several states, in the cases hereinafter specially provided for; and shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction...
Page 41 - ... jurisdiction, if the course of proceeding be not specifically pointed out by this code or the statute, any suitable process or mode of proceeding may be adopted which may appear most conformable to the spirit of this code.— Code amend.— 1880:43.
Page 316 - Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice?