Page images
PDF
EPUB

Review of proceedings.

ADMINISTRATION.

See "Appeal"; "Certiorari"; "Justices of the Of estate of decedent, see "Executors and Ad-
Peace," 2; "New Trial."

[blocks in formation]

and severance.

ministrators."

Of estate of ward, see "Guardian and Ward,"
§ 1.

Of trust property, see "Trusts," § 3.

ADMISSIONS.

Suits in equity to set aside a deed and will As evidence, see "Evidence," § 3.
before probate to certain property in question
held properly joined and tried as one.-Irving

v. Bruen (Sup.) 180.

ADVERSE POSSESSION.

Code Civ. Proc. § 484 held not to authorize See "Limitation of Actions."

the joinder of causes of action for penalties

for violations of Agricultural Law, Laws 1893,
p. 655, c. 338.-People v. Koster (Sup.) 829.

ADVERTISEMENT.

3. Commencement, prosecution, and Official newspapers, see "Newspapers."

termination.

[blocks in formation]

Under Code Civ. Proc. § 611, it was improper
for the court to grant a stay of another action
pending in another court, arising out of the
same transaction, without the execution of a
bond by the party procuring the stay.-Walkup
v. Mesick (Sup.) 142.

An order staying trial of an action by de-
fendant against plaintiff, brought in the munic-
pal court, pending the trial of an action in
the Supreme Court by plaintiff against de-
fendant, arising out of the same transaction,
held not a proper exercise of discretion.-Wal-
kup v. Mesick (Sup.) 142.

AFFIDAVITS.

See "Depositions."

Particular proceedings or purposes.
See "Attachment." § 3; "New Trial," § 1;
"Submission of Controversy."

Proceedings for public improvement in city,
see "Municipal Corporations," § 5.
Supplementary proceedings, see "Execution,"
§ 1.

AFTER-ACQUIRED TITLE.

Estoppel to assert, see "Estoppel," § 1.

AGENCY.

A motion to stay an action to foreclose a
mortgage, brought in a county where the prop- See "Principal and Agent."
erty was situated, as required by Code Civ.
Proc. § 982, held properly refused.-Curlette
7. Olds (Sup.) 144.

ACTION ON THE CASE.

See "Trespass," § 2.

ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW.
Effect on jurisdiction of equity, see "Equity,"
§ 1; "Injunction," § 1; "Specific Perform-
ance," § 1.

ADJOINING LANDOWNERS.

*Where an owner of land removed the lateral
upport whereby an adjoining owner was in-
ured, he was liable for damages.-Riley v.
Continuous Rail Joint Co. (Sup.) 283.

ADJUDICATION.

Operation and effect of former adjudication,
see "Judgment," §§ 5, 6.

AGREED CASE.

Submission of controversy to court, see "Sub-
mission of Controversy.'

AGREEMENT.

See "Contracts."

AGRICULTURE.

Joinder of causes of action for penalties for
violation of agricultural law, see "Action,"
§ 2.

ALIENATION.

Suspension of power of alienation of property,
see "Perpetuities."

ALIMONY.

See "Divorce," § 3; "Husband and Wife," § 3.

• Point annotaced. See syllabus.

AMENDMENT.

and 131 New York State Reporter

Of particular legal proceedings.

See "Judgment," § 3; "Pleading," § 6.

In municipal court, see "Courts," § 1.

the payment of costs.-Terriberry v. Mathot (Sup.) 20.

*A reversal cannot be had on a ground of exception to which the attention of the trial court was not specifically directed.-Coles v. Interur

Pleading in action for slander, see "Libel and ban St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 289.
Slander," § 2.

Pleading in equity, see "Equity," § 2.

AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY. Jurisdictional amount, see "Courts," § 1.

ANNULMENT.

Of will, see "Wills," § 3.

ANSWER.

In pleading, see "Pleading," §§ 3, 4.

APPEAL.

See "Certiorari"; "New Trial." Costs in action after remand by appellate court, see "Costs," § 1.

Review of condemnation proceedings, see "Eminent Domain," § 3.

Review of criminal prosecutions, see "Criminal Law," § 4.

Review of proceedings of justices of the peace, see "Justices of the Peace," § 2. Review of proceedings of municipal court, see "Courts," § 1.

§ 1. Decisions reviewable.

An order denying defendants' motion for costs of plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is not appealable.-Abrahams v. Finkelstein (Sup.)

987.

*Where a defendant has appeared in an action and afterwards permits default judgment against him, he cannot appeal from the judgment.-Levenson v. Arnold (Sup.) 990.

§ 2. Right of review.

Act of special guardian of incompetent in accepting payment of allowance for services held not a waiver of his right to appeal from decree settling the accounts of the committee of the incompetent.-In re Edwards (Sup.) 185.

The aldermen held parties aggrieved within Code Civ. Proc. § 1294, and entitled to appeal from an order restraining the common council from proceeding with an election to fill a vacancy caused by resignation of an alderman.Koster v. Coyne (Sup.) 433.

§ 3. Presentation and reservation in

lower court of grounds of review. The determination of the trial court that there has been a mistrial cannot be reviewed where the only error alleged is that the court erred in granting a new trial conditionally on

Where no opposition was made to an amendment of a complaint, no exception taken, and no application for adjournment made, no question was raised for review.-Devery v. Winton Motor Carriage Co. (Sup.) 392.

*In an action for attorney's services, defendants held not entitled to object on appeal to the amount allowed.-Burke v. Baker (Sup.) 768.

A ruling denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings cannot be reviewed on appeal, where the ruling was not excepted to.-E. T. Burrowes Co. v. Rapid Safety Filter Co. (Sup.) 1048.

Where, in an action on a contract, evidence of a waiver of one of its terms was admitted without objection, it could not be contended on appeal that this evidence was inadmissible be cause no waiver was pleaded.-E. T. Burrowes Co. v. Rapid Safety Filter Co. (Sup.) 1048.

Where the question of the sufficiency of the complaint is not raised in the trial court, and the defect is one that can be cured by amendment, it is not available on appeal.-Russell v. Barron (Sup.) 1061.

A party is not required to move to strike testimony erroneously admitted over objections. Tracey v. Reid (Sup.) 1074.

In an action by a real estate agent for comheld sufficient to present a question as to missions, an exception to denial of a nonsuit whether the contract for the sale of the property was enforceable against the purchaser procured by plaintiff.-Van Allen v. Peabody (Sup.) 1119. 8 4. Requisites and proceedings for

transfer of cause.

Abbreviation in clerk's signature upon copy of judgment served upon defendant's attorney held insufficient to invalidate the notice of entry of judgment so as to preclude the setting in motion of the time for appeal.-Salzman v. Mandel (Sup.) 298.

5. Record and proceedings not in rece

ord.

[blocks in formation]

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

[blocks in formation]

aban-access, aside from any consequential damages,
if any, from the taking of the easements, had
in themselves only a nominal value, held re-
versible error.-Schmitz v. Brooklyn Union Ele-
vated R. Co. (Sup.) 791.

The court cannot determine the merits on
motion to dismiss an appeal.-In re Edwards
(Sup.) 185.

7. Review.

Where a complaint contained a contract count
and a quantum meruit count, it would be pre-
sumed, on appeal, under the proof, that judg-
ment was rendered on the contract count.-
Finney v. Bennett (Sup.) 291.

*In action for libel, decision on appeal held
law of the case, conclusive on trial court and
on a subsequent appeal.-Carpenter v. New
York Journal Pub. Co. (Sup.) 478.

Where defendant's motion "to set aside the
verdict as contrary to the law and the evidence"
was granted, and an order entered, he cannot
appeal from the order and contend that the
court should have further directed a verdict for
defendant.-Carmichael v. John Hancock Mut.
Life Ins. Co. (Sup.) 976.

*Where the evidence bearing on a question
of fact will warrant a finding either way there-I
on, a finding by the court on a trial without a
jury is conclusive on appeal.-Neumann v. Wel-
kowitz (Sup.) 980.

*On appeal from a directed verdict, the ap-
pellant is entitled to the most favorable in-
ference deducible from the evidence.-West v.
Woodruff (Sup.) 1054.

[blocks in formation]

*Admission of evidence not materially affect-
ing the conclusions of the court held not ground
for reversal.-Olmstead v. Rawson (Sup.) 239.
Refusal of the motion of a party to strike
out the answers of his witness, which are ir-
responsive and hearsay, held harmless.-De
Coster v. Herzog Co. (Sup.) 295.

Refusal to instruct, in an action against a
street railway company for injury to a pas-
senger, that to permit overcrowding was not
negligence as matter of law, held error.-
Schmidt v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
(Sup.) 390.

*An instruction that a carrier was bound to
exercise a high degree of care held not cause for
reversal. Whittacker v. Brooklyn, Q. C. & S.
R. Co. (Sup.) 414.

*In an action against a city for injuries to a
pedestrian, an instruction held not prejudicial
to the city.-Kopper v. City of Yonkers (Sup.)
425.

Admission in evidence of certain affidavit of
party under order of examination held harmless.
-Bowers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.
(Sup.) 485.

On the issue of election by a widow to take
under the will in lieu of dower, exclusion of
certain evidence held not reversible error.-In
re Tisdale (Sup.) 494.

[blocks in formation]

ARBITRATION AND AWARD.

See "Reference"; "Submission of Controversy."
§ 1. Submission.

*The right to recover damages stipulated by
it for its breach held not a "dispute" between
the parties within the arbitration clause of the
contract.-Grant v. Pratt & Lambert (Sup.) 29.

*An arbitration clause in a contract held no
defense to an action on the contract; defendants
having taken no steps to carry out the agree
ment for arbitration.-Grant v. Pratt & Lam-
bert (Sup.) 29.
*Point annotated. See syllabus.

In an action for damages by the maintenance
of an elevated railroad, the refusal of the court
to find that the easements of light, air, and

See "Bail."

and 131 New York State Reporter

ARREST.
Conspiracy to cause, see "Conspiracy," § 1.
Illegal arrest, see "False Imprisonment."
§ 1. In civil actions.

Complaint alleging fraud in the procuring of goods and affidavits in support thereof held sufficient to authorize the arrest of defendant, under Code Civ. Proc. §§ 549, 557.-Vorhees Rubber Mfg. Co. v. McEwen (Sup.) 942.

A complaint alleging fraud in the procuring of goods held as good, though defectively verified, as an unverified complaint, and hence sufficient to support an arrest, under Code Civ. Proc. $8 549 557.-Vorhees Rubber Mfg. Co. v. McEwen (Sup.) 942.

[blocks in formation]

ASSESSMENT.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Of compensation for property taken for public Of risk by employé, see "Master and Servant,” use, see "Eminent Domain," § 3.

Of damages, see "Damages," § 4.

Of expenses of public improvements, see "Municipal Corporations," § 6.

Of tax, see "Taxation," § 2.

Payment of assessment on premises demised, see "Landlord and Tenant,"

§ 4.

ASSIGNMENTS.

For benefit of creditors, see "Assignments for Benfit of Creditors."

Fraud as to creditors, see "Fraudulent Conveyances."

Right of assignee of bond to recover against surety, see "Principal and Surety," 8 1.

$$ 6, 7.

Of risk by passenger, see "Carriers," § 2.

ATTACHMENT.

See "Execution."

Exemptions, see "Exemptions."

§ 1. Nature and grounds.

*Plaintiffs in an action on contract held entitled to an attachment, though both parties are nonresidents.-Bridges v. Wade (Sup.) 156. 2. Proceedings to procure.

A complaint for fraud and misrepresentations held not to allege any proper measure of dam

ages, and insufficient to sustain an attachment.-Downing v. Nelson (Sup.) 1005.

Transfers of particular species of property,§ 3. Proceedings to support or enforce.

rights, or instruments.

See "Insurance," § 4; "Landlord and Tenant," § 2; "Mortgages," § 1.

Assets of insolvent corporation, see "Corporations," § 5.

Contract of sale, see "Sales," § 2.
Corporate shares, see "Corporations," § 1.
Property exempt from execution, see "Exemp-
tions," § 1.

§ 1. Actions.

*Where plaintiff had transferred her entire cause of action to a coplaintiff, prior to commencing the action, the complaint was demurrable for misjoinder of parties plaintiff.-Alexander v. City of Gloversville (Sup.) 198.

A complaint and affidavit held sufficient to sustain a warrant of attachment.-Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co. (Sup.) 104.

§ 4. Quashing, vacating, dissolution, or abandonment.

*The court will not consider the merits of

the action on a motion to vacate an attachment.-Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co. (Sup.) 104.

ATTORNEY AND CLIENT.

Attorneys in fact, see "Principal and Agent." Change of attorney in surrogates' court, see "Courts," § 2.

*Point annotated. See syllabus.

Documents of attorney as evidence, see "Evi- | his knowledge, by his client.-Oishei v. Metro-
dence," § 5.
politan St. Ry. Čo. (Sup.) 447, 450, 451.

Enforcement of lien of attorney against execu-
tor or administrator, see "Executors and Ad-
ministrators," § 1.

Liability of attorney for contempt of court, see
"Contempt," § 2.

Power of probate court to enforce lien of at-
torney, see "Courts," § 2.

Questions presented for review in action for
attorney's services, see "Appeal," § 3.
Reference in action between, see "Reference,"
§ 1.

f 1.

Retainer and authority.

An attorney held not the agent of the person
furnishing money to make a loan. so as to
charge him with the knowledge acquired by the
attorney.-Flanders v. Rosoff (Sup.) 514.

*A party has the absolute right to change his
attorney.-Anglo-Continental Chemical Works
v. Dillon (Sup.) 1081.

*Under rule 10 of the general rules of practice,
where an attorney has received no compensa-
tion for his services, and no misconduct is
shown, a substitution should not be granted
without protecting his lien.-Anglo-Continental
Chemical Works v. Dillon (Sup.) 1081.

§ 2. Duties and liabilities of attorney
to client.

*Statement of what an attorney must show to
sustain a transaction advantageous to himself
with his client.-In re Holland (Sup.) 202.

3. Compensation and lien of attor-

ney.

*An attorney held to have no lien for costs,
under Code Civ. Proc. § 66, on the proceeds
of a settlement by his client.-Oishei v. Metro-
politan St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 447, 450, 451.

In an action for attorney's services, evidence
held insufficient to show that defendant ever
employed plaintiffs.-Altkrug v. Horowitz (Sup.)
716.

*The amount contracted to be paid for at-
torney's services will not be reviewed by the
courts, in the absence of evidence evincing a
purpose on the part of the attorney to obtain
an improper advantage of his client.-Burke
v. Baker (Sup.) 768.

Evidence held insufficient to establish a con-
tract for the payment of certain attorney's
services.-Kneeland v. Hurdy (Sup.) 957.

AUTHORITY.

Of agent, see “Principal and Agent," § 1.
Of attorney, see "Attorney and Client," § 1.
Of broker, see "Brokers," § 1.

BAIL.

§ 1. In criminal prosecutions.

*Under Code Cr. Proc. § 568, a recognizance
held sufficient to constitute a contract enforce-
able against the surety, though the blank for
the amount agreed to be paid if the principal
fail to appear is left unfilled.-People v. Torn
(Sup.) 523.

BAILMENT.

Where an attorney, under an agreement for a
contingent fee of half of the recovery, recovered
damages for property, taken for a street, held
that the owner of the property was estopped to See "Banks and Banking," § 1; "Carriers," § 1.
assert that a mortgage thereof had not been
paid, or that it should be paid out of the amount
recovered.-Deering v. Schreyer (Sup.) 14.

BANKRUPTCY.

BANKS AND BANKING.

In an action by an attorney involving a divi- See "Assignments for Benefit of Creditors."
sion of the proceeds of damages recovered held
that plaintiff was entitled to interest on his
share while they were deposited with the city
chamberlain, and that he was chargeable with
interest on an amount held by him for a cer-
tain time in excess of the amount of his share.-
Deering v. Schreyer (Sup.) 14.

*An attorney has a lien for his compensation
for professional services and for disbursements
on the moneys and property received by him on
his client's behalf in the course of his employ
ment. In re Bender's Will (Sup.) 171; In re
Smith, Id.; In re Scherer, Id.

*The right of an attorney to a lien for his
compensation is not affected by the fact that
the client is an executor, and that the services
were rendered and property received on behalf
of the estate. In re Bender's Will (Sup.) 171;
In re Smith, Id.; In re Scherer, Id.

*Statement of right of an attorney, under
Code Civ. Proc. § 66, to enforce his lien for
fees on the proceeds of a settlement, without

Liability for payment of check as dependent on
validity of indorsement, see "Bills and Notes,"
§ 2.

Trust in bank deposit, see "Trusts," §§ 1, 2.

§ 1. Functions and dealings.

Check cashed by bank on strength of forged
indorsement held sufficiently tendered to the
bank to authorize suit against it for cashing
the check.-Kearny v. Metropolitan Trust Co.
(Sup.) 274.

*Negligence of depositor in failing to dis-
cover a forgery in an indorsement of a check
held not prejudicial to the bank, so as to pre-
clude the depositor from repudiating the pay-
ment made by the bank on the check-Kearny
V. Metropolitan Trust Co. (Sup.) 274.

*Delay in suing a bank for paying a check
on a forged indorsement held, under the cir-
* Point annotated. See syllabus.

« PreviousContinue »