Page images
PDF
EPUB

Liability of

successors for decedent's obligations.

to direct the attorney-general to convey the same to the parties entitled, or to a new trustee appointed by the court. 1 R. S., 718, §§ 1, 2.

§ 531. Those who succeed to the property of a decedent are liable for his obligations in the cases, and to the extent prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.

See Appendix D, chapter 3.

DIVISION THIRD.

OBLIGATIONS.

PART I. Obligations in General.

II. Obligations arising from Particular
Transactions.

[blocks in formation]

§ 532. An obligation is a legal duty, by which a per- Definition son is bound to do or not to do a certain thing.

of obligations.

§ 533. An obligation arises either from

1. The contract of the parties; or,

2. The operation of law.

How crea ted.

[blocks in formation]

Definition

DEFINITION.

SECTION 534. Definition of contract.

535. Its requisites.

§ 534. A contract is an agreement to do or not to do a of contract. certain thing.

Its requisites.

§ 535. It is essential to the existence of a contract that there should be

1. Parties capable of contracting;

2. Their consent;

3. A lawful object;

4. A sufficient cause or consideration.

Code La., 1772, 1758, 1759; Code Napoleon, 1108.

ARTICLE II.

PARTIES.

SECTION 536. Who may contract.

537. Identification.

§ 536. All persons are capable of contracting, except

1. Infants, they having only such capacity as is defined by Part I of the First Division of this Code;

2. Persons of unsound mind, they having only such capacity as is defined by the same Part.

3. Persons deprived of civil rights.

Who may contract.

tion.

§ 537. The parties must not only exist, but it must be Identificapossible to identify them, or there is no contract.

ARTICLE III.

OBJECT OF A CONTRACT.

SECTION 538. Definition of the object.

539. Object to be lawful and possible.

540, 541. Object unlawful.

542, 543. Impossibility of object.

544. Object ascertainable.

§ 538. The object of a contract is the thing which it is Definition agreed to do or not to do.

Martin v. McCormick, 8 N. Y., 335.

of the object.

§ 539. The object of a contract must be lawful, possible,1 Object to be and ascertainable."

1Code La., 1885, 1886.

Code La., 1880; Richards v. Edick, 17 Barb., 260; Abeel
v. Radcliff, 13 Johns., 300; see Tracy v. Albany Exch.
Co., 7 N. Y., 474.

540. That is not lawful which is:

1. Contrary to an express provision of law;'

lawful and possible.

Object unlawful.

Object unlawful.

Impossi

bility of object.

Id.

Object as

2. Contrary to the policy of the law, though not expressly prohibited ;*

3. Otherwise contrary to good morals.*

This is without distinction as to malum prohibitum and malum in se. Pennington v. Townsend, 7 Wend., 276; Leavitt v. Palmer, 3 N. Y., 19; De Groot v. Van Duzer, 20 Wend., 390; Pratt v. Adams, 7 Paige, 653; Seneca Co. Bk. v. Lamb, 26 Barb., 595.

2 Bell v. Leggett, 7 N. Y., 176, 181; Gray v. Hook, 4 N. Y., 449.

8 Lady Cox's Case, 3 Peere Wms., 339; Walker v. Perkins,

3 Burr., 1568.

§ 541. All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for fraud, wilful injury to the person or property of another, or any violation of law, whether wilful or negligent, are against the policy of the law, and so far void.

§ 542. Everything is deemed possible, except that which is physically impossible.

§ 543. Impossibility is to be determined, not by the means or ability of the party, but by the nature of things.'

1 Code La., 1885, 2028; see McNeill v. Reed, 9 Bing., 68; Beebe v. Johnson, 19 Wend., 500; Harmony v. Bingham, 12 N. Y., 99.

544. That is deemed ascertainable which is capable certainable. of being ascertained by the time the contract is to be performed.

ARTICLE IV.

CONSENT.

SECTION 545. Assumption of obligations by acceptance of benefit.

546. Essentials of consent.

547. Consent, when voidable.

548, 549. Apparent consent, procured by duress, menace, fraud,

&c.

550. Duress.

551. Menace.

552. Fraud, actual or constructive.

553. Actual fraud.

554. Constructive fraud.

« PreviousContinue »