...reargument.51 On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument r>- that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning...speaks of "persons born or naturalized in the United States." The word also appears both in the Due Process Clause and in the Equal Protection Clause. "Person"...

...much on reargument. On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargnment that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. That is from Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113, 156. I submit that biological science has outstripped...

...view lacks a legal precedent in the United States. The Court found that no cases in law can be cited "that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment." Legal persons — those entitled to protection by the Constitution — do not include the unborn. The...

...error when it apparently reli on the concession by appellee in Wade "that no case could be cited tl holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amet ment."248 There are two relevant observations to be made about ti statement. In the first instance...

...has application only post natally.'' Additionally, quoting from the Court, "no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the 14th amendment." This point was of singular importance because: "If this suggestion of personhood is...

...that it has application only tx natally.'' Additionally, quoting from the Court, "no case could be cit that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning of the 14t amendment." This point was of singular importance because : "If this suggestion of personhood is...

...arrive at any consensus." The Court continued to say that no legal precedent could be found to hold that "a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment" and that as used in the Constitution, the word "person" has application only "postnatally." However,...

...the legislative, branch of government. Hence a Congressional finding or declaration that an embryo or a fetus is a "person" within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment cannot change existing law as enunciated by the Supreme Court. Any other rule would mean an end to...

...reargument. 0n the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument that no case could be cited that holds a fetus is a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth...speaks of "persons born or naturalized in the United States." The word also appears both in the Due Process Clause and in the Equal Protection Clause. "Person"...

...on reargument." On the other hand, the appellee conceded on reargument " that no case could be cited that holds that a fetus is a person within the meaning...many words. Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment con"Tr. of Rear*. 20-21. " Tr. of Rearg. 24. 42 ROK v. WADE tains three references to "person." The...