American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy
Most people believe that large corporations wield enormous political power when they lobby for policies as a cohesive bloc. With this controversial book, Mark A. Smith sets conventional wisdom on its head. In a systematic analysis of postwar lawmaking, Smith reveals that business loses in legislative battles unless it has public backing. This surprising conclusion holds because the types of issues that lead businesses to band together—such as tax rates, air pollution, and product liability—also receive the most media attention. The ensuing debates give citizens the information they need to hold their representatives accountable and make elections a choice between contrasting policy programs.
Rather than succumbing to corporate America, Smith argues, representatives paradoxically become more responsive to their constituents when facing a united corporate front. Corporations gain the most influence over legislation when they work with organizations such as think tanks to shape Americans' beliefs about what government should and should not do.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Business Unity and Its Consequences for Representative Democracy
Identifying Business Unity
A Portrait of Unifying Issues
Public Opinion Elections and Lawmaking
Overt Sources of Business Power
Structural Sources of Business Power
Other editions - View all
action actually American analysis appear associations attention attitudes become benefits bill business power business unity campaign Chamber changes chapter citizens collective companies conflictual Congress congressional conservative considered contributions corporations debates decisions dependent determine developed direction economic effect elections empirical estimated evidence examine example exist expected explain favorable federal findings firms follow gain given groups House identify ideological impacts important includes increase independent indicators industries influence Institute interest investment kinds lawmaking laws lead legislative liberal major matter means measure observers officials opposed organizations outcomes particularistic parties partisan percent period policymaking political politicians positions possible potential preferences presented produce programs proposals public mood public opinion questions reach reason relationship represent require responsiveness Senate side social specific statistical structural theory think tanks unifying issues unity variable votes
Page 226 - From management sciences to policy sciences;' in Michael J. White et al. (eds.), Management and Policy Science in American Government. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 269-295. Dryzek, John (1982). "Policy analysis as a hermeneutic activity;' Policy Sciences 14: 309-329. Dye, Thomas R. (1978). "Oligarchic tendencies in national policy-making: the role of private policyplanning organizations;' Journal of Politics 40: 309-333.