The generally accepted doctrine in this country is, as stated' by Mr. Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods, nor any other means of getting them than to go into... Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Page 49by Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, Augustus Newton Martin, James Buckley Black, John Worth Kern, Francis Marion Dice, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1866Full view - About this book
| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 942 pages
...EQUITY— MAY 1. Sawyer, Wallace & Co. v. Taggart. APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. 1. CONTRACTS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS TO BE DELIVERED AT A FUTURE DAY are not invalidated by the circumstance that, at the time of making the contract, the purchaser intends... | |
| William Roberts - Evidence (Law) - 1807 - 522 pages
...Bl. 63, and the Court of King's Bench in Cooper » Elston, 7 TR 14, have moat emphatically decided, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future period, is as much within the statute as where the goods are to be delivered immediately. Upon the... | |
| Law - 1843 - 530 pages
...OF SALE . ( Contract for sale and future delivery of goods not then in vendor's possession, valid.) A contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered...the contract, the vendor neither has the goods in his possession, nor has entered into any contract to buy them, nor has any reasonable expectation of... | |
| Royal Agricultural Society of England - Agriculture - 1893 - 1182 pages
...Matthews as follows : — The generally accepted doctrine in this country is, as stated by Mr. Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods nor any other means of getting them than to go into... | |
| Joseph Chitty - Contracts - 1841 - 1040 pages
...offences at common law (b). A wager on the future price of goods would not seem to be illegal (c). Nor is a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor neither has the goods in... | |
| William Selwyn - Nisi prius - 1842 - 814 pages
...made by persons who had an option either to work for this or that person as they chose. A contract (Z) for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future...the contract, the vendor neither has the goods in his possession, nor (i) Coppock v. Bower, 4 M. & W. (/) Hibblewhite M'Morme, 5 M. & W. 361. 4f>2, cited... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Edward Younge, John Collyer - Equity - 1844 - 712 pages
...whole interest. She is, therefore, entitled to a decree: Graham v. Oliver (g). At law, a contract for sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is not rendered void by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor had neither the possession... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Chancery - Equity - 1850 - 652 pages
...whole interest. She is, therefore, entitled to a decree : Graham v. Oliver.(d) At law, a contract for sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is not rendered void by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor had neither the possession... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - Law reports, digests, etc - 1854 - 750 pages
...article of commerce or manufacture. It was distinctly held, in Hibblewhite v. M'Morine, 5 M. & W. 462, f that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered...the contract, the vendor neither has the goods in *his possession, nor has entered into any contract to buy them, nor has any reasonable expectation... | |
| |