editions:HARVARD32044098885452

Hence the allegations set out no more than a failure to prosecute others because of a lack of knowledge of their prior offenses. This does not deny equal protection due petitioners under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Federal assistance to State and local criminal justice agencies: hearing ... - Page 23
by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Criminal Laws and Procedures - 1978
Full view - About this book

United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ..., Volume 368

United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1962 - 934 pages

...after the three-time offenders had reached the penitentiary, were available to the prosecutors.11 Hence the allegations set out no more than a failure to...the Fourteenth Amendment. See Sanders v. Waters, 199 F. 2d 317 (CA 10th Cir. 1952) ; Oregon v. Hicks, 213 Ore. 619, 325 P. 2d 794 (1958). Moreover, the...

Full view - About this book

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Administrative procedure - 1978 - 1036 pages

...values. The habitual criminal statute of West Virginia was challenged in Oyler v. Boles, 368 US 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962), on the ground that...Cir. 1952) ; Oregon v. Hicks, 213 Or. 619, 325 P.2d 794 (1958). Moreover, the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a...

Full view - About this book