Federal assistance to State and local criminal justice agencies: hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Laws and Procedures of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... Senator BIDEN . Thank you very much . I appreciate your coming over and I thank you for your work in this area . Mr. PATTISON . Thank you . Senator BIDEN . Now we will proceed to our panel . Gentlemen , I would suggest that we proceed ...
... Senator BIDEN . Thank you very much . I appreciate your coming over and I thank you for your work in this area . Mr. PATTISON . Thank you . Senator BIDEN . Now we will proceed to our panel . Gentlemen , I would suggest that we proceed ...
Page 16
... Senator BIDEN . Excuse me . There is a vote on the floor of the Senate . When you hear that buzzer , I will have to leave and I will be gone for a few moments , so I may have to interrupt you in a moment . Mr. WORK . Thank you , Senator ...
... Senator BIDEN . Excuse me . There is a vote on the floor of the Senate . When you hear that buzzer , I will have to leave and I will be gone for a few moments , so I may have to interrupt you in a moment . Mr. WORK . Thank you , Senator ...
Page 26
... Senator BIDEN . I bet some of them thought that they were the ones being prosecuted , is that right ? Mr. HAMILTON . Yes . Senator BIDEN . I am serious . I have had witnesses come to me and say , " I only saw it ; I did not do anything ...
... Senator BIDEN . I bet some of them thought that they were the ones being prosecuted , is that right ? Mr. HAMILTON . Yes . Senator BIDEN . I am serious . I have had witnesses come to me and say , " I only saw it ; I did not do anything ...
Page 40
... Senator BIDEN . The chart you have up now is a chart of the record of an individual , one person ? Mr. SILBERT . That is correct , Senator . It is an unnamed person , containing only information about his age and the number of arrests ...
... Senator BIDEN . The chart you have up now is a chart of the record of an individual , one person ? Mr. SILBERT . That is correct , Senator . It is an unnamed person , containing only information about his age and the number of arrests ...
Page 41
... Senator BIDEN . The grand jury failed to indict ? Mr. SILBERT . Yes . Senator BIDEN . Then , he waited not quite another month until April 15 when he committed another robbery probably because he was of- fended that he had not gotten a ...
... Senator BIDEN . The grand jury failed to indict ? Mr. SILBERT . Yes . Senator BIDEN . Then , he waited not quite another month until April 15 when he committed another robbery probably because he was of- fended that he had not gotten a ...
Common terms and phrases
agencies assault and robbery bail believe bill burglary career criminal program career criminal prosecution career criminal unit caseload Chairman charged cities committed committee conviction rate court crime control criminal justice system Criminal Laws defendants dismissed district attorneys District of Columbia effective effort eligible unit Enforcement Assistance Administration felony fiscal going grant HAAS habitual offenders Hamilton handled Harris County hear Houston Police Department ICAP identify impact indictment Inslaw Institute for Law investigation jurisdictions jury juvenile larceny Law and Social Law Enforcement Assistance LEAA LEAA funding LEAA's legislation ment misdemeanor Montgomery County National Rifle Association parole percent person plea bargaining police departments prior arrests priority prison probation problem Promis Promis data Promis Research prosecutor's office prosecutors rape recidivists record Repeat Offenders Prosecution Senator BIDEN sentencing serious SILBERT statement statistics street Subcommittee on Criminal successful thing tion U.S. Senator witnesses
Popular passages
Page 18 - Just last week the Subcommittee on Criminal Laws and Procedures of the Senate Judiciary Committee reported S.
Page 51 - Moreover, the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation. Even though the statistics in this case might imply a policy of selective enforcement, it was not stated that the selection was deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.
Page 49 - On motion of the defendant, to another judicial district when it appears that there is a reasonable likelihood that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the judicial district.
Page 61 - Federal Offenders in the United States District Courts, 1964" (Washington: The Office, nd), tableólo, p. 36, and table 25, p. 49. 106 "split-sentence" cases, with a probation period following confinement.2 The offenses of this group, as well as their backgrounds, were similar to those of many prisoners serving similar sentences in State and local facilities.
Page 23 - Within the limits set by the legislature's constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, "the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation" so long as "the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.
Page 30 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE WESTERN TELCON, INC.
Page 23 - The guaranty was aimed at undue favor and individual or class privilege, on the one hand, and at hostile discrimination or the oppression of inequality, on the other. It sought an equality of treatment of all persons, even though all enjoyed the protection of due process.
Page 32 - I have read the foregoing requisition and know the contents thereof, and the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to the matters which are therein stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true.
Page 23 - Hence the allegations set out no more than a failure to prosecute others because of a lack of knowledge of their prior offenses. This does not deny equal protection due petitioners under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Page 90 - The Rand Paper Series Papers are issued by The Rand Corporation as a service to its professional staff. Their purpose is to facilitate the exchange of ideas among those who share the author's research interests: Papers are not reports prepared in fulfillment of Rand's contracts or grants. Views expressed in a Paper are the author's own, and are not necessarily shared by Rand or its research sponsors. The Rand Corporation...