Federal assistance to State and local criminal justice agencies: hearing before the Subcommittee on Criminal Laws and Procedures of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session ...

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 18 - Just last week the Subcommittee on Criminal Laws and Procedures of the Senate Judiciary Committee reported S.
Page 51 - Moreover, the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation. Even though the statistics in this case might imply a policy of selective enforcement, it was not stated that the selection was deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.
Page 49 - On motion of the defendant, to another judicial district when it appears that there is a reasonable likelihood that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the judicial district.
Page 61 - Federal Offenders in the United States District Courts, 1964" (Washington: The Office, nd), tableólo, p. 36, and table 25, p. 49. 106 "split-sentence" cases, with a probation period following confinement.2 The offenses of this group, as well as their backgrounds, were similar to those of many prisoners serving similar sentences in State and local facilities.
Page 23 - Within the limits set by the legislature's constitutionally valid definition of chargeable offenses, "the conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation" so long as "the selection was [not] deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.
Page 30 - IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE WESTERN TELCON, INC.
Page 23 - The guaranty was aimed at undue favor and individual or class privilege, on the one hand, and at hostile discrimination or the oppression of inequality, on the other. It sought an equality of treatment of all persons, even though all enjoyed the protection of due process.
Page 32 - I have read the foregoing requisition and know the contents thereof, and the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to the matters which are therein stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true.
Page 23 - Hence the allegations set out no more than a failure to prosecute others because of a lack of knowledge of their prior offenses. This does not deny equal protection due petitioners under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Page 90 - The Rand Paper Series Papers are issued by The Rand Corporation as a service to its professional staff. Their purpose is to facilitate the exchange of ideas among those who share the author's research interests: Papers are not reports prepared in fulfillment of Rand's contracts or grants. Views expressed in a Paper are the author's own, and are not necessarily shared by Rand or its research sponsors. The Rand Corporation...

Bibliographic information