The American Law Times Reports, Volume 41877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page 18
As a sealed instrument , it could be assigned , as required by the statute , to enable the assignee to sue in his own name ; but then no liability would arise by the assignment , upon which the assignor could be held responsible ...
As a sealed instrument , it could be assigned , as required by the statute , to enable the assignee to sue in his own name ; but then no liability would arise by the assignment , upon which the assignor could be held responsible ...
Page 19
1 . thus become absolute owner , with right to maintain suit in his own name , within the meaning of the statute ; and though the assignment may not be extended until the time of trial , it is regarded , for the purposes of the suit ...
1 . thus become absolute owner , with right to maintain suit in his own name , within the meaning of the statute ; and though the assignment may not be extended until the time of trial , it is regarded , for the purposes of the suit ...
Page 28
If the limitation of the statute was effectual to bar the assignee , the United States might have set up the bar . But that was not done ; after the suit of the assignee has been allowed to progress to judgment , and the money has been ...
If the limitation of the statute was effectual to bar the assignee , the United States might have set up the bar . But that was not done ; after the suit of the assignee has been allowed to progress to judgment , and the money has been ...
Page 40
Under this head it is contended that the statute of Indiana creates a new liability , and could not , therefore , be applied to cases where the injuries complained of were caused by marine torts , without interfering with the exclusive ...
Under this head it is contended that the statute of Indiana creates a new liability , and could not , therefore , be applied to cases where the injuries complained of were caused by marine torts , without interfering with the exclusive ...
Page 41
In the present case no such operation can be ascribed to the statute of Indiana . That statute imposes no tax , prescribes no duty , and in no respect interferes with any regulations for the navigation and use of vessels .
In the present case no such operation can be ascribed to the statute of Indiana . That statute imposes no tax , prescribes no duty , and in no respect interferes with any regulations for the navigation and use of vessels .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirming agent agreement alleged amount appear appellant applied assignee authority bank bill bonds brought building cause charge circuit court circumstances citizen claim common Constitution contract corporation creditors damages debt decision decree defendant delivered direct District duty effect entitled error evidence execution existence express fact give given ground held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable limited March matter mortgage necessary negligence notice Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present principle proceedings prove purchaser question railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover removal rendered road rule statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trial United valid void York