The American Law Times Reports, Volume 41877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 86
Page 1
If such an assessment was lawful there would be ground for a bill in equity to remove a cloud upon title . APPEAL in chancery from St. Clair Circuit . C. J. Walker , for complainant . W. T. Mitchell , for defendant .
If such an assessment was lawful there would be ground for a bill in equity to remove a cloud upon title . APPEAL in chancery from St. Clair Circuit . C. J. Walker , for complainant . W. T. Mitchell , for defendant .
Page 5
The case is consequently a proper one for a bill to remove a cloud from the title . But to such a bill the city should have been made a party , as the cloud would not be removed by merely enjoining the action of the marshal on his tax ...
The case is consequently a proper one for a bill to remove a cloud from the title . But to such a bill the city should have been made a party , as the cloud would not be removed by merely enjoining the action of the marshal on his tax ...
Page 45
A parol agreement between a railroad company and an adjoining owner , for the removal and discontinuance of a fence on the line of the railroad , does not run with the land , and cannot therefore bind his grantee .
A parol agreement between a railroad company and an adjoining owner , for the removal and discontinuance of a fence on the line of the railroad , does not run with the land , and cannot therefore bind his grantee .
Page 48
The fence having been removed at the request of , and under an arrangement made with , the managing owner , Mr. Stickney , under whom the plaintiff holds , and whose interest he has , he cannot repudiate that agreement ; in fact ...
The fence having been removed at the request of , and under an arrangement made with , the managing owner , Mr. Stickney , under whom the plaintiff holds , and whose interest he has , he cannot repudiate that agreement ; in fact ...
Page 49
... removal or discontinuance of a fence on the line of a railroad , between the owner of the land and the railroad company , does not run with the land , and cannot , therefore , bind his grantee . Gilman v . Eur . f . N. A. R. R. Co.
... removal or discontinuance of a fence on the line of a railroad , between the owner of the land and the railroad company , does not run with the land , and cannot , therefore , bind his grantee . Gilman v . Eur . f . N. A. R. R. Co.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirming agent agreement alleged amount appear appellant applied assignee authority bank bill bonds brought building cause charge circuit court circumstances citizen claim common Constitution contract corporation creditors damages debt decision decree defendant delivered direct District duty effect entitled error evidence execution existence express fact give given ground held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable limited March matter mortgage necessary negligence notice Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present principle proceedings prove purchaser question railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover removal rendered road rule statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trial United valid void York