The American Law Times Reports, Volume 41877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page 13
On the margin of the note was the memorandum : “ This note is issued on mortgage of Myers Brothers , left for record June 18 , 1872. ” Vol . IV . ] JACKSON v . MYERS . January , 1877. ] 13 THE AMERICAN LAW TIMES REPORTS .
On the margin of the note was the memorandum : “ This note is issued on mortgage of Myers Brothers , left for record June 18 , 1872. ” Vol . IV . ] JACKSON v . MYERS . January , 1877. ] 13 THE AMERICAN LAW TIMES REPORTS .
Page 21
... and which by inadvertence has found its way among the records of the court , does not put an end to the powers of the assignee ... it is no part of the record , and may be ordered by the court to be stricken from the files . 5.
... and which by inadvertence has found its way among the records of the court , does not put an end to the powers of the assignee ... it is no part of the record , and may be ordered by the court to be stricken from the files . 5.
Page 25
And in the order of the court of claims , made on February 23 , 1874 , by which S. E. Jenner was made attorney of record for said Raymond as assignee of Maybin , instead of Bartley & Casey , it was provided that Bartley & Casey should ...
And in the order of the court of claims , made on February 23 , 1874 , by which S. E. Jenner was made attorney of record for said Raymond as assignee of Maybin , instead of Bartley & Casey , it was provided that Bartley & Casey should ...
Page 27
If the facts as claimed were borne out by the record , I should feel inclined to hold on this point with the attorneys for Maybin . But as I read the record , Raymond never was discharged as assignee . It is true a discharge written ...
If the facts as claimed were borne out by the record , I should feel inclined to hold on this point with the attorneys for Maybin . But as I read the record , Raymond never was discharged as assignee . It is true a discharge written ...
Page 29
The record shows that the suit against the United States was prosecuted solely by Harris & Harris and their associates , and it fails to show any service performed by Adam & Speed and Jenner , or either of them , towards the recovery of ...
The record shows that the suit against the United States was prosecuted solely by Harris & Harris and their associates , and it fails to show any service performed by Adam & Speed and Jenner , or either of them , towards the recovery of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirming agent agreement alleged amount appear appellant applied assignee authority bank bill bonds brought building cause charge circuit court circumstances citizen claim common Constitution contract corporation creditors damages debt decision decree defendant delivered direct District duty effect entitled error evidence execution existence express fact give given ground held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable limited March matter mortgage necessary negligence notice Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present principle proceedings prove purchaser question railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover removal rendered road rule statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trial United valid void York