The American Law Times Reports, Volume 41877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 89
Page 5
We have deferred to the last a question raised by the defendants which goes to the jurisdiction of the court . We have decided in several cases that equity has no jurisdiction to restrain the collection of a tax from goods and chattels ...
We have deferred to the last a question raised by the defendants which goes to the jurisdiction of the court . We have decided in several cases that equity has no jurisdiction to restrain the collection of a tax from goods and chattels ...
Page 26
They assert that the district court had no jurisdiction to make the decree . They claim this on several grounds : First . Because the proceeding in bankruptcy was completed and concluded before Raymond was authorized to prosecute the ...
They assert that the district court had no jurisdiction to make the decree . They claim this on several grounds : First . Because the proceeding in bankruptcy was completed and concluded before Raymond was authorized to prosecute the ...
Page 27
... 1870 , Raymond , his assignee , was subsequently , but soon after also discharged , and that this ended and closed the bankruptcy proceedings , and all proceedings thereafter in said bankruptcy were without jurisdiction , and void .
... 1870 , Raymond , his assignee , was subsequently , but soon after also discharged , and that this ended and closed the bankruptcy proceedings , and all proceedings thereafter in said bankruptcy were without jurisdiction , and void .
Page 39
1 . ing generally to the rights , duties , and liabilities of citizens , is of obligatory force within its territorial jurisdiction , although it may indirectly and remotely affect the operations of foreign or inter - state commerce ...
1 . ing generally to the rights , duties , and liabilities of citizens , is of obligatory force within its territorial jurisdiction , although it may indirectly and remotely affect the operations of foreign or inter - state commerce ...
Page 40
It is , therefore , of no moment to the defendants that the supreme court of Indiana held that the state possessed concurrent jurisdiction with Kentucky on the river , under the act of the Commonwealth of Virginia of 1789 , providing ...
It is , therefore , of no moment to the defendants that the supreme court of Indiana held that the state possessed concurrent jurisdiction with Kentucky on the river , under the act of the Commonwealth of Virginia of 1789 , providing ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirming agent agreement alleged amount appear appellant applied assignee authority bank bill bonds brought building cause charge circuit court circumstances citizen claim common Constitution contract corporation creditors damages debt decision decree defendant delivered direct District duty effect entitled error evidence execution existence express fact give given ground held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable limited March matter mortgage necessary negligence notice Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present principle proceedings prove purchaser question railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover removal rendered road rule statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trial United valid void York