The American Law Times Reports, Volume 41877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 82
Page 29
What were the services they agreed to perform ? The petition of the assignee for authority to employ counsel represented that among the assets of the bankrupt there was a claim against the United States for cotton taken from bankrupt's ...
What were the services they agreed to perform ? The petition of the assignee for authority to employ counsel represented that among the assets of the bankrupt there was a claim against the United States for cotton taken from bankrupt's ...
Page 45
A parol agreement between a railroad company and an adjoining owner , for the removal and discontinuance of a fence on the line of the railroad , does not run with the land , and cannot therefore bind his grantee .
A parol agreement between a railroad company and an adjoining owner , for the removal and discontinuance of a fence on the line of the railroad , does not run with the land , and cannot therefore bind his grantee .
Page 46
“ The agreement , then , goes no further than to those persons who are parties to it , and who are bound by it ; and the party owning the land may assume the obligation , if he chooses , to keep up the fence ; and if he does , so far ...
“ The agreement , then , goes no further than to those persons who are parties to it , and who are bound by it ; and the party owning the land may assume the obligation , if he chooses , to keep up the fence ; and if he does , so far ...
Page 48
It was an agreement acted upon by the defendants , and it is not competent for the plaintiff to repudiate it without notice . It was competent for Stickney to make such an agreement . Tombs v . Rochester & Syracuse Railroad , 18 Barb .
It was an agreement acted upon by the defendants , and it is not competent for the plaintiff to repudiate it without notice . It was competent for Stickney to make such an agreement . Tombs v . Rochester & Syracuse Railroad , 18 Barb .
Page 64
BERRY . а A contract for the sale and purchase of wheat to be delivered in good faith at a future time is not void as a “ wagering contract ; " but when under such an agreement it is understood by the parties that no wheat is to be ...
BERRY . а A contract for the sale and purchase of wheat to be delivered in good faith at a future time is not void as a “ wagering contract ; " but when under such an agreement it is understood by the parties that no wheat is to be ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirming agent agreement alleged amount appear appellant applied assignee authority bank bill bonds brought building cause charge circuit court circumstances citizen claim common Constitution contract corporation creditors damages debt decision decree defendant delivered direct District duty effect entitled error evidence execution existence express fact give given ground held injury intent interest issue judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable limited March matter mortgage necessary negligence notice Ohio operation opinion original owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present principle proceedings prove purchaser question railroad Railroad Company reason received record recover removal rendered road rule statute sufficient suit supreme court taken tion trial United valid void York