Ꭼ Ꭱ Ꭱ Ꭺ Ꭲ Ꭺ.

In

KUTZ v. DREIBELBIS, page 68. In col. ii., line 9, insert after the word "death" the words "of Kutz." line 12, for "these," read "then," and omit "had.” In line 14, for "conflict," read "coupled ;" and in line 16, omit the word "and."

WOELPPER'S Appeal, page 234. In col. i., line 5 from bottom, the word "at" should be omitted.

COMMONWEALTH V. KERCHNER, page 260. The names of counsel were transposed. Boies Penrose represented the Commonwealth; J. P. Klinges, contra.

(vi)

167 Beck, City of Williamsport v.

423

City of Bradford v. Downs

153

ARTICLE ON "THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY OF RAILROAD BONDHOLDERS"

ACT OF MAY 9, 1889, RELATING TO APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT
FORMS FOR TAKING APPEALS TO SUPREME COURT, UNDER ACT OF MAY 9, 1889