Organizational Justice and Human Resource ManagementWhy are some acts but not others perceived to be fair? How do people who experience unfairness respond toward others held accountable for the unfairness? This book reviews the theoretical organizational justice literature and explores how the research on justice applies to various topics in organizational behaviour including personnel selection systems, performance appraisal and the role of fairness in resolving workplace conflict.
Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management considers justice in organizations within a new framework - Fairness Theory - which integrates previous work in this area by focusing on accountability for events with negative impact on material and psychological well-being. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page xvi
... sense of what is fair . Anything else would require us to imagine a world in which no one cared about who got what , or in which there were no rules governing the allocation of benefits and punishments . This is not easy for us to ...
... sense of what is fair . Anything else would require us to imagine a world in which no one cared about who got what , or in which there were no rules governing the allocation of benefits and punishments . This is not easy for us to ...
Page 21
... sense ; but in the sense of unfairness as social injustice , it makes more sense to distinguish personalized and depersonalized cases . In contrast to the loss of the crops , which results only from the uncertainties of natural ...
... sense ; but in the sense of unfairness as social injustice , it makes more sense to distinguish personalized and depersonalized cases . In contrast to the loss of the crops , which results only from the uncertainties of natural ...
Page 184
... sense of outcome discrepancy or deprivation in a generic sense , whereas the accountability model's expanded analysis of Would acknowledges that the negativity of an event's impact can vary in several different ways and for several ...
... sense of outcome discrepancy or deprivation in a generic sense , whereas the accountability model's expanded analysis of Would acknowledges that the negativity of an event's impact can vary in several different ways and for several ...
Contents
Equity and Distributive Justice as Outcome Fairness | 1 |
Process as Procedural and Interactional Justice 35555 | 25 |
Two Theoretical Syntheses | 50 |
Copyright | |
3 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management Robert G. Folger,Russell Cropanzano Limited preview - 1998 |
Common terms and phrases
actions Agent applicants Applied Psychology appraisal aspects behavior Bies causal chapter cognitive cognitive distortion cognitive-abilities tests concepts conduct conflict consequences considered context counterfactual Cropanzano decision maker discussion disputants distributive justice drug testing effects employees equity equity theory evaluation evidence example exchange experience explanation factors Fairness Theory field study Folger Gilliland Greenberg grievance harm human impact implications individuals inequity injustice inputs intentions interactional justice interpersonal sensitivity interviews involve Journal of Applied Konovsky less Lewis Lind mediation Michael Lewis moral negative norms obligations organization Organizational Behavior organizational justice outcomes participants perceived fairness perceptions performance performance appraisal person positive potential procedural fairness procedural justice psychological contract ratings reactions reason referred relevant responses Retributive Justice role Salomon Salomon Brothers selection self-interest Shapiro Sheppard smoking ban Social Psychology someone suggests supervisor Thibaut and Walker third party tions Tyler unfair validity voice workplace