Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES

CITED AND AN INDEX.

BY JOHN W. KERN,

OFFICIAL REPORTER.

VOL. 104,

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE NOVEMBER TERM, 1885.

INDIANAPOLIS:
THE BOWEN-MERRILL CO., LAW PUBLISHERS.

1886.

CARLON & HOLLENBECK, PRINTERS AND BINDERS.

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1886,

BY JOHN W. KERN,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

28, 1886

PRINTED AND BOUND BY CARLON & HOLLENBECK,

INDIANAPOLIS.

ELECTROTYPED BY INDIANAPOLIS ELECTROTYPE

FOUNDRY.

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Adams, Bipford v........

41 | Churchman, Cook v...................141 Allen v. Kersey

1 Cincinnati,Indianapolis St.Louis American Ins. Co v. Gibson ..336 and Chicago R.W.Co.v. Gaines. 526 Amsden, Cochran v..... .282 City of Delphi v. Startzman ......343 Anderson, Barton y..... .578 Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati Anderson v. State.........

.467 and Indianapolis R. R. Co. v. Anderson v. Worley.... ..165 Newell .....

.264 Clouser y.Ruckman....

.588 Baltimore and Ohio and Chicago Cochran v. Amsden......

.282 R. R. Co. v. Rowan.... 88 Cole, Proctor V ............

373 Barton y. Anderson. .578 Conger v. Miller..

.592 Berry v. Massey.......

.486 Conn, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and Bills, Chicago, St. Louis and Pitts St. Louis R. W. Co. V ............ 64 burgh R. R. Co. V.....

13 Cook v. Churchman.... ..141 Binford v. Adams........ 41 Coulter, Lucas v.........

81 Bird v. State........

..384 Crawfordsville and Southwestern Board of Comm’rs of Howard Co. T. P. Co. v. Fletcher......... 97 v. Jennings.. ..108 Crume v. Wilson

.583 Board of Comm’rs of Pike Co., Culbertson v. Munson ..... ..451

State, ex rel. Miller, V........... 123
Board of Comm’rs of Shelby Co., Day v. Henry........

.324 Washburn V.....

...321 Delphi, City of, v.'Startzman .....343 Board of Comm’rs of Wells Co., Dickey, Joyce V........ .........183 Gavin v.....

.... 201 Boswell, State V....... ........541 Elmore v. Overton....................548 Bothwell v. Millikan

.162 Evansville Foundry Association, Bowen, Burkett V.........

184

Riehl v. Bowen, Goss V............. .207 Ex Parte Hopkins...

..157 Bowser, Butner V..........

.255 Boyce, Bufkin V.......... 53 Fair, Rowley V...

.189 Breedlove, Johnson V...............521 Falvey, Louisville, New Albany Brown v. Searle

.218 and Chicago R. W. Co. V........409 Bryan v. Lyon

.. 227 Farnsley, Tracewell v...... .........497 Bufkin v. Boyce.........

53 Faurote, State, ex rel. Neff, V...... 287 Burk v. Simonson ....... ..173 Fisher, Hinkle v...

84 Burkett v. Bowen..... ..184 Fleming, Kelso v....

.-180 Burkett v. Holman .....

6 Fletcher, Crawfordsville and Butner y. Bowser......

.255 Southwestern T. P. Co. V......... 97 Floyd, Sinker ..........

291 Campbell v. Hunt........ .210 Forgerson v. Smith..

.246 Carver, Lowery V........ .447 Foster, Lake Shore and Michigan Carver v. Lewis......

.438 Southern R. W. Co. y......... ..293 Chicago, St. Louis and Pittsburgh Freshour v. Logansport and R. R. Co. v. Bills .....

13 Northern T. P. Co..................463 (iii)

Gaines, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Lake Shore and Michigan South

St. Louis and Chicago R. W. ern R. W. Co. v. Fuster...... .293 Co. V........

.526 Larrew, Kratli v......... ..363 Garmire v. State.. .444 Levering, Rochester V...............

..562 Garrigus, Supreme Council Or Lewis, Carver V...........

.438 der of Chosen Friends v ......... 133 Lipes v. Hand......

....503 Gavin v. Board of Comm’rs of Logansport and Northern T. P. Wells Co....... .201 Co., Freshour V.........

.463 Gibson, American Ins. Co. V......

....336 Louisville, New Albany and ChiGlidden v. Henry....... ...278 cago R. W. Co. v. Faivey.....

.409 Godman, Louisville, New Albany Louisville, New Albany and Chi

and Chicago R. W. Co. V........490 cago R. W. Co. v. Godman......490 Goss v. Bowen....

..207 | Louisville, New Albany and ChiGrant, School Town of Monti cago R. W. Co. v. Grantham...353 cello v...

...168 Louisville, New Albany and ChiGrantham, Louisville, New Al cago R. W. Co. v. Indianapo

bany and Chicago R. W. Co. v.353 lis and Westfield G. R. Co...... 600 Gray, Hadlock v. ....596 Lowery v. Carver......

..447 Lucas v. Coulter......

81 Hadley v. Musselman..... .459 Lyon, Bryan V..........

.227 Hadlock v. Gray

.596 Ham, Millikan v

.498 Manier, Holderman V....... .118 Hand, Lipes v....

.503 Marion, Pennsylvania Co. V...... 239 Harlan v. Jones..., ..167 Massey, Berry V...

486 Hayes, West V.......

30 McGuire, Western Union Tel. Co. Hayes, West V....... ..251

..130 Heap v. Parrish........

36 McWilliams, Shulse V..............

......512 Hedges v. Keller. .479 Miller, Conger V....................

......592 Heller, Walker V....... ..327 Millikan, Bothwell V....... ..162 Henry, Day V...........

.324 Millikan, Scott V................. 75 Henry, Glidden v... ..278 Millikan v. Ham ......

.498 Hinkle v. Fisher.....

84 Monticello, School Town of, v. Holderman v. Manier.. .118 Grant

...168 Holman, Burkett v....... 6 Morgan Civil Township v. Hunt..590 Hopkins, Ex Parte..... .157 Morris v. State......

.457 Howes, Reeves v........ .435 Munson, Culbertson V...............

..451 Hunt, Campbell v....

.210 Murphy, Terwilliger V.............. 32 Hunt, Morgan Civil Tp. V......... 590 Musselman, Hadley v ......... 459 Huseman v. Sims........

.317

Newell, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolis and Westfield G. R. Cincinnati and Indianapolis Co., Louisville, New Albany

R. R. Co. V ...........

......264 and Chicago R. W. Co. V........600

Nietert v.
Trentman....

.390 Irwin v. Kilburn....

.............. 113
Overton, Elmore V...........

......548 Jackson v. State, for use of Dyar 516 Parrish, Heap V........

36 Jennings, Board of Comm’rs of

Pennsylvania Co. v. Marion......239 Howard Co. V........... ...108 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Johns v. State...........

Louis R. W. Co. v. Conn......... 64 Johnson v. Breedloge...............521 Powell v. Powell.. Johnson v. Stephenson........... .....368 Proctor v. Cole.........

...373 Jones, Harlan .......

..167 Joyce v. Dickey ....... .183 Read v. Yeager......

.195 Reeves v. Howes...

..435 Keller, Hedges V...

.479 Riehl v. Evansville Foundry AsKelso v. Fleming. .180 sociation........

70 Kersey, Allen ............ 1 Riggs v. State..........

.261 Kilburn, Irwin .. ..........

.113 Rochester v. Levering... ...562 Kleyla, Wright v............ .223 Rowan, Baltimore and Ohio and Kratli v. Larrew.. .363 Chicago R. R. Co. V.........

.... 88

[ocr errors]

...

...557

18

« PreviousContinue »