Page images
PDF
EPUB

BOOK II.

RHETORICAL EXCELLENCE.

CHAPTER I.

CHOICE OF WORDS.

THE efficiency of all communication by language must depend on three things: (1) the choice of those words. that are best adapted to convey to the persons addressed the meaning intended; (2) the use of as many words as are needed to convey the meaning, but of no more; (3) the arrangement of words, sentences, and paragraphs in the order most likely to communicate the meaning.

Value of an

ample vocab

A writer should have not only ideas to express, but words with which to express them. The larger his vocabulary, the more likely he is to find in it ulary. just the form of expression he needs for the purpose in hand. It is from poverty of language quite as much as from poverty of thought that school and college compositions often suffer. Material which counts for little in the hands of a tyro, because of his inability to present it in appropriate language, would tell for much in the hands of a writer who has so many words at his command that he can find a fresh expression for every fresh thought or fancy.

To have words at one's command, it is not enough to know what they mean. Many that we understand in

books, and perhaps recognize as old friends, do not come to mind when we sit down to write. Others that we know a little better will not come without more effort than we are disposed to make. The easy, and therefore the usual, course is to content ourselves with those that we are in the habit of using; and most of us use very few Even in Shakspere the whole number of words is "not more than fifteen thousand; in the poems of Milton not above eight thousand. The whole number of Egyptian hieroglyphic symbols does not exceed eight hundred, and the entire Italian operatic vocabulary is said to be scarcely more extensive." 1 The vocabulary of business has not been estimated, but it is certainly small. So is that of ordinary conversation.

Poverty of language is the source of much slang, a favorite word or phrase-as nice, nasty, beastly, jolly, bully, ghastly, elegant, exciting, fascinating, overworked gorgeous, stunning, splendid, awfully, utterly, words. vastly, most decidedly, perfectly lovely, perfectly maddening, how very interesting! - being employed for so many purposes as to serve no one purpose well.

[ocr errors]

The modern use of slang "is vulgar,” writes T. A. Trollope, “because it arises from one of the most intrinsically vulgar of all the vulgar tendencies of a vulgar mind, — imitation. There are slang phrases which, because they vividly or graphically express a conception, or clothe it with humour, are admirable. But they are admirable only in the mouths of their inventors.

“Of course it is an abuse of language to say that the beauty of a pretty girl strikes you with awe. But he who first said of some girl that she was 'awfully' pretty, was abundantly justified by the half humorous, half serious consideration of all the effects such loveliness may produce.":

1 Marsh: Lectures on the English Language, lect. viii.
2 T. A. Trollope: What I Remember, vol. i. chap. ii.

"There are certain words," says "The Lounger," in "The Critic," ," "that are good enough words in themselves, but which used in unusual connections become conspicuous and finally odious. Some time ago the favorite slang word of literature was 'certain.' Every heroine had a 'certain nameless charm,' etc., and every hero a ‘certain air of distinction' about him, until you longed for one whose qualities were more uncertain in their nature or degree. 'Certain' seems to have had its day; and now the favorite slang word of literature is 'distinctly.' Heroines are now 'distinctly regal' in their bearing, and there is about the heroes a manner that is 'distinctly fine,' or whatever the adjective may be. In a book that I read not many days ago, the word 'distinctly' used in this way appeared three times on one page, until I was distinctly bored and laid it down in disgust. 'Precious' used to be one of the tortured vocables, and there was a class of art-critics that went so far as to describe the paintings of their favorites as 'distinctly precious.'

66

1

[ocr errors]

Nothing," says "The Saturday Review," "is gained, indeed much is lost, by calling the rocks 'weird.' Weird' is played out long ago,' as Mr. Swinburne says; it is smeared over the coarse pallet of the descriptive reporter. There are some other terms in the same hackneyed state; Quida has got at them, and so have all the lady novelists who find language an insufficient vehicle for their thoughts that burn. Among these ill-used

[ocr errors]

phrases are 'strange,' wild,' and 'glamour,' all which we regret to see that Mr. Symonds, in a certain passage, piles together: 'The Italy of the Renaissance fascinated our dramatists with a strange, wild glamour.' Mr. Symonds may remember the Ars Poetica of the author of Alice in Wonderland. The Master says:Now there are certain epithets

Which suit with any word,

As well as Harvey's Reading sauce
With fish, or flesh, or bird;

[ocr errors]

Of these 'wild,' lonely,' 'dreary,' 'strange,'

Are much to be preferred.

The neophyte answers:

Ah will it do, ah will it do,

To take them in a lump,

The [New York] Critic, March 11, 1893, p. 147.

As, the wild man went his dreary way

To a strange and lonely pump'?

No, no, you must not hastily to such conclusions jump!

"For our part, when a writer declares that anything is weird, wild, or strange, we consider that he does not quite know what he wants to say."1

Other expressions that have been worked so hard of late that the life has gone out of them are: epoch-making, clear-cut, factor, feature, galore, handicap, trend; atmosphere, feeling, technique, values, from painters' dialect; environment, tendency, struggle for existence, survival of the fittest, from the dialect of modern science; objects of interest; the near future; to the fore; in touch with; replete with interest; it seems to me; to detect the recurrence of; the irony of fate; along the line of or along these lines; a note of, as in "There is a note of scholarship in the book;" consensus, as in "consensus of opinion;" content, as in "ethical content."2 For mercy's sake, for heaven's sake, thunder, Jupiter, confound it, the deuce take it, and expressions still more objectionable, prevail among persons whose fund of language is small; for, as Mr. Crawford says, "Swearing is the refuge of those whose vocabulary is too limited to furnish them with a means of expressing anger or disappointment."3

The first thing, then, to be done by a man who would learn to speak or to write well is to enrich his vocabulary. How can he do this?

One way is to gather words from a dictionary, as Chat

The Saturday Review, May 17, 1879, p. 624.

2 For other examples, see "Our English;" English in Newspapers and Novels, pp. 120–125.

8 F. Marion Crawford: With the Immortals, chap. viii

ham and Browning 2 did. Another way is to translate How to enrich from the ancient classics, as the great advocate, Rufus Choate, used to do. Still another

one's vocabu

lary.

way is to become familiar with the classics of one's native tongue, taking care always to learn with the new word its exact force in the place where it occurs, the plan followed by Benjamin Franklin and by Mr. Stevenson.

-

"About this time," writes Franklin, "I met with an odd volume of the Spectator. It was the third. I had never before seen any of them. I bought it, read it over and over, and was much delighted with it. I thought the writing excellent, and wished, if possible, to imitate it. With this view I took some of the papers, and making short hints of the sentiment in each sentence, laid them by a few days, and then, without looking at the book, try'd to compleat the papers again, by expressing each hinted sentiment at length, and as fully as it had been expressed before, in any suitable words that should come to hand. Then I compared my Spectator with the original, discovered some of my faults, and corrected them. But I found I wanted a stock of words, or a readiness in recollecting and using them, which I thought I should have acquired before that time if I had gone on making verses; since the continual occasion for words of the same import, but of different length, to suit the measure, or of different sound for the rhyme, would have laid me under a constant necessity of searching for variety, and also have tended to fix that variety in my mind, and make me master of it. Therefore I took some of the tales and turned them into verse; and, after a time, when I had pretty well forgotten the prose, turned them back again. I also sometimes jumbled my collections of hints into confusion, and after some weeks endeavored to reduce them into the best order,

1 Chatham "told a friend that he had read over Bailey's English Dictionary twice from beginning to end." Lecky: History of England in the Eighteenth Century, vol. ii. chap. viii.

2

When the die was cast, and young Browning [at eighteen] was definitely to adopt literature as his profession, he qualified himself for it by reading and digesting the whole of Johnson's Dictionary." Mrs. Sutherland Orr: Life of Robert Browning, vol. i. chap. iv.

« PreviousContinue »